Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Cultural Approach Based on Bhinneka Tunggal Ika in Horizontal Conflict Resolution Firli Bahuri; Agus Surono; Adnan Hamid; Irwansyah Irwansyah
Jurnal Lemhannas RI Vol 13 No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55960/jlri.v13i4.1155

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyse the characteristics of horizontal conflict in Indonesia and evaluate the significance of a cultural approach based on Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity) for conflict resolution. This study also examines the contribution of a cultural approach to more effective, sustainable conflict resolution strategies, aligned with the Asta Gatra framework as a pillar of national resilience. Study Design/Methodology/Approach: This study uses an interpretivist-phenomenological philosophy with an empirical-inductive method and an archival study strategy to identify patterns of culture-based conflict resolution in various regions of Indonesia. The data were obtained through a literature review, document analysis, and stakeholder interviews and then analysed reductively to ensure links with the socio-cultural, ideological, and security dimensions of Asta Gatra. Findings: The research results indicate that a cultural approach based on Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity) has significant potential to reduce horizontal conflict and strengthen social cohesion. However, implementation limitations due to a lack of integration with policy, development, and the legal system require collaboration between the government, indigenous communities, and legal institutions as a key to national stability.
Legal Politics the Position of Witnesses and the Right to Assitance by Advocates in Criminal Cases RR Duni Nurbayanti; Agus Surono; Arti Panday
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1706

Abstract

The examination of witnesses is very important in the examination of criminal cases, because these witnesses can shed light on a case. A witness is an individual who has direct information about a criminal event. A person is brought forward as a witness because he immediately "hears, sees and experiences" the criminal case. Witnesses are expected to provide information for the purposes of investigation, prosecution, and justice about a criminal case. So important is the position of the witness, so the existence of the witness should be regulated in laws and regulations, including the assistance of advocates when giving information in front of police investigators. This study examines the legal politics of witness regulation in criminal cases, with reference to the Criminal Code. The Indonesian people are waiting for the renewal of the Criminal Code to replace Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Law. This research concludes that legal politics as shown by the Draft Criminal Procedure Law provides more opportunities for advocates to provide legal services for suspects and witnesses in the examination of criminal cases ranging from the level of investigation in the police to the examination in court
Reformulating the Governance of Carbon Economic Value Based on Pancasila Ethics and Climate Justice to Address Inequality and Prevent Crimes in Indonesia’s Carbon Trading Silverius Y. Soeharso; Agus Surono; Adnan Hamid; Phattharawadee Rangsimanop
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1707

Abstract

This article critically examines the urgency of reformulating the governance framework of Carbon Economic Value (CEV) in Indonesia by integrating the ethical principles of Pancasila as Indonesia’s national ideology and climate justice. The increasing risks of inequality, greenwashing, and transnational environmental crimes in voluntary and compliance carbon markets demand a just, adaptive, and integrity-based legal approach. By highlighting the current regulatory gaps and institutional weaknesses, this paper proposes a hybrid legal framework for carbon trading, anchored in Indonesia’s national ideology, environmental law, and behavioral economic approaches. The article concludes with specific policy recommendations and outlines a roadmap for legislative reform to ensure Indonesia's carbon governance is both globally competitive and locally just.
Legal Reconstruction of the Position of Tax Courts Following the Issue of Constitutional Court Decisions No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 Wenceslaus Wenceslaus; Agus Surono; Adnan Hamid; Sonyendah Retnaningsih; Tanawat Teepapal
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1711

Abstract

As stated in Article 1(8) of the Judicial Power Act, tax courts are special courts under the Supreme Court and part of the judicial branch. According to Article 1(5) of the Tax Court Law, tax disputes are those arising in the field of taxation between taxpayers and authorized officials as a result of a decision that can be appealed or challenged in the Tax Court, in accordance with tax laws and regulations. This includes lawsuits regarding the enforcement of tax collection based on the Tax Collection Act with a Summons. Law No. 17 of 1997 on Tax Collection by Means of a Forced Execution Letter regulates tax disputes arising from tax collection actions by officials that do not comply with legal procedures, causing taxpayers to feel aggrieved. Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 is based on Article 24(1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which states that the Supreme Court and the courts under its authority exercise judicial power. The decision reaffirms that the Tax Court is part of the judicial power and that the Supreme Court must supervise it. Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 aims to enhance the Tax Court's independence. Transferring the authority for the organization, administration, and finance of the Tax Court from the Ministry of Finance to the Supreme Court is expected to achieve this goal. Prior to the decision, the Tax Court was under the Supreme Court within the Administrative Court System. The Tax Court was also under the Ministry of Finance in terms of organizational, administrative, and financial supervision in accordance with Article 5(2) of Law No. 14 of 2002 on the Tax Court. However, the arrangement of the status of tax courts following the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 has raised the issue that the decision does not automatically amend the provisions of Law No. 14 of 2002 on Tax Courts, particularly Article 5(2). According to Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023, the Supreme Court is responsible for supervising the organization, administration, and finances of the Tax Courts. However, Article 5(2) of Law No. 14 of 2002 of the Republic of Indonesia on Tax Courts grants the Ministry of Finance the authority to supervise the organization, administration, and finances of the Tax Courts. These conflicting provisions result in the loss of the Tax Court's status as an independent judicial institution.