Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Cultural Approach Based on Bhinneka Tunggal Ika in Horizontal Conflict Resolution Firli Bahuri; Agus Surono; Adnan Hamid; Irwansyah Irwansyah
Jurnal Lemhannas RI Vol 13 No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55960/jlri.v13i4.1155

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyse the characteristics of horizontal conflict in Indonesia and evaluate the significance of a cultural approach based on Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity) for conflict resolution. This study also examines the contribution of a cultural approach to more effective, sustainable conflict resolution strategies, aligned with the Asta Gatra framework as a pillar of national resilience. Study Design/Methodology/Approach: This study uses an interpretivist-phenomenological philosophy with an empirical-inductive method and an archival study strategy to identify patterns of culture-based conflict resolution in various regions of Indonesia. The data were obtained through a literature review, document analysis, and stakeholder interviews and then analysed reductively to ensure links with the socio-cultural, ideological, and security dimensions of Asta Gatra. Findings: The research results indicate that a cultural approach based on Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity) has significant potential to reduce horizontal conflict and strengthen social cohesion. However, implementation limitations due to a lack of integration with policy, development, and the legal system require collaboration between the government, indigenous communities, and legal institutions as a key to national stability.
Reformulating the Governance of Carbon Economic Value Based on Pancasila Ethics and Climate Justice to Address Inequality and Prevent Crimes in Indonesia’s Carbon Trading Silverius Y. Soeharso; Agus Surono; Adnan Hamid; Phattharawadee Rangsimanop
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1707

Abstract

This article critically examines the urgency of reformulating the governance framework of Carbon Economic Value (CEV) in Indonesia by integrating the ethical principles of Pancasila as Indonesia’s national ideology and climate justice. The increasing risks of inequality, greenwashing, and transnational environmental crimes in voluntary and compliance carbon markets demand a just, adaptive, and integrity-based legal approach. By highlighting the current regulatory gaps and institutional weaknesses, this paper proposes a hybrid legal framework for carbon trading, anchored in Indonesia’s national ideology, environmental law, and behavioral economic approaches. The article concludes with specific policy recommendations and outlines a roadmap for legislative reform to ensure Indonesia's carbon governance is both globally competitive and locally just.
Effevtiveness of Regulations for Collecting Income Tax From E-Commerce Transactions Through Social Media Tax Fairness For MSMES Sumartono Sumartono; Adnan Hamid; Mashlihati Nur Hidayati; Sineenart Suasoongnern
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1708

Abstract

The information technology revolution has changed the face of global trade, including in Indonesia. Rapid advances in digital technology have had a significant impact on the national trading system, where buying and selling activities are no longer limited to conventional trade but have developed into electronic-based trade transactions. This study analyzes the effectiveness of regulations on the collection of income tax from e-commerce transactions via social media on tax fairness for MSMEs in Indonesia. The evolution of e-commerce tax regulations shows a gradual development from the 2021 HPP Law to PMK 37/2025, but there are still significant legal gaps in the regulation of transactions via social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp Business. Using a normative legal research method with a legislative and conceptual approach, this study applies Soerjono Soekanto’s theory of legal effectiveness and John Rawls’ theory of justice as analytical tools. The findings indicate that PMK 37/2025 is ineffective in reaching social media transactions due to the informal characteristics of these platforms that enable transactions without formal registration, payments through personal transfers, and communication via private chats. This regulatory gap creates distributive injustice that disadvantages traditional MSMEs, who are bound by strict tax obligations while competitors on social media can avoid tax burdens. Soekanto’s theoretical analysis shows the regulation fails to meet the implementability criteria for the social media segment, while Rawls’ theory identifies violations of equality and reasonableness principles that create unfair competition. The study concludes that comprehensive regulation combining technological automation with procedural simplification is necessary to achieve equitable competitive conditions for all business actors.
Legal Reconstruction of the Position of Tax Courts Following the Issue of Constitutional Court Decisions No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 Wenceslaus Wenceslaus; Agus Surono; Adnan Hamid; Sonyendah Retnaningsih; Tanawat Teepapal
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1711

Abstract

As stated in Article 1(8) of the Judicial Power Act, tax courts are special courts under the Supreme Court and part of the judicial branch. According to Article 1(5) of the Tax Court Law, tax disputes are those arising in the field of taxation between taxpayers and authorized officials as a result of a decision that can be appealed or challenged in the Tax Court, in accordance with tax laws and regulations. This includes lawsuits regarding the enforcement of tax collection based on the Tax Collection Act with a Summons. Law No. 17 of 1997 on Tax Collection by Means of a Forced Execution Letter regulates tax disputes arising from tax collection actions by officials that do not comply with legal procedures, causing taxpayers to feel aggrieved. Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 is based on Article 24(1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which states that the Supreme Court and the courts under its authority exercise judicial power. The decision reaffirms that the Tax Court is part of the judicial power and that the Supreme Court must supervise it. Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 aims to enhance the Tax Court's independence. Transferring the authority for the organization, administration, and finance of the Tax Court from the Ministry of Finance to the Supreme Court is expected to achieve this goal. Prior to the decision, the Tax Court was under the Supreme Court within the Administrative Court System. The Tax Court was also under the Ministry of Finance in terms of organizational, administrative, and financial supervision in accordance with Article 5(2) of Law No. 14 of 2002 on the Tax Court. However, the arrangement of the status of tax courts following the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 has raised the issue that the decision does not automatically amend the provisions of Law No. 14 of 2002 on Tax Courts, particularly Article 5(2). According to Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023, the Supreme Court is responsible for supervising the organization, administration, and finances of the Tax Courts. However, Article 5(2) of Law No. 14 of 2002 of the Republic of Indonesia on Tax Courts grants the Ministry of Finance the authority to supervise the organization, administration, and finances of the Tax Courts. These conflicting provisions result in the loss of the Tax Court's status as an independent judicial institution.