Khafidhoh Nurul Aini
Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analysis Junior High School Students' Conceptual Understanding of Flat-Sided Space Structures Based on Bloom's Taxonomy Ahmad ubaidillah; Luluk Faridah; Khafidhoh Nurul Aini
Riemann: Research of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): EDISI AGUSTUS
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Katolik Santo Agustinus Hippo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38114/reimann.v7i2.108

Abstract

This study aims to analyze junior high school students' conceptual understanding in solving problems on three-dimensional with flat surfaces based on the revised Bloom's Taxonomy. This research employed a descriptive qualitative method with 6 seventh-grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Glagah , selected through purposive sampling. The research instruments consisted of essay tests and semi-structured interview guidelines referring to the six cognitive levels of Bloom's Taxonomy (C1–C6) and validated by experts. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, with methodological triangulation to ensure the validity of the findings. The results showed that 13% of students were in the high category, 73% in the medium category, and 13% in the low category. High-category students mastered all conceptual understanding indicators, while medium- and low-category students experienced difficulties at the analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5), and creating (C6) levels. These findings indicate the need for learning strategies that enhance higher-order thinking skills through contextual problem-solving, the use of visual media, and problem-based learning.
ANALISIS BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA SMP BERKEPRIBADIAN INTROVERT DAN EKSTROVERT MELALUI ETNOMATEMATIKA LEGENDA SUMUR GILING LAMONGAN Almas Nabilah As Sa'adah; Luluk Faridah; Khafidhoh Nurul Aini
EDUCATOR : Jurnal Inovasi Tenaga Pendidik dan Kependidikan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Penelitian Indonesia (P4I)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51878/educator.v6i3.14748

Abstract

Mathematical critical thinking is one of the essential competencies that should be developed in twenty-first-century mathematics education. However, students' critical thinking skills remain relatively low and are influenced by various factors, including personality type and instructional approach. This study aimed to describe the profile of mathematical critical thinking skills of introverted and extroverted students in solving ethnomathematics-based problems derived from the Sumur Giling Lamongan legend through the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach. This research employed a descriptive qualitative design. The participants consisted of four eighth-grade students of MTs Ma'arif 15 Tarbiyatul Huda Sendang Duwur selected through purposive sampling, including two introverted students and two extroverted students with relatively similar mathematical abilities. Data were collected through a personality questionnaire, a mathematical critical thinking test, semi-structured interviews, and documentation. Data were analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña model involving data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing, while data credibility was ensured through technique triangulation and member checking. The findings revealed that introverted students fulfilled all six critical thinking indicators proposed by Facione, namely interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation. In contrast, extroverted students fulfilled only three indicators, namely interpretation, analysis, and inference, while evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation were not optimally demonstrated. The study concludes that integrating CTL with the ethnomathematical context of the Sumur Giling Lamongan legend facilitates meaningful mathematical understanding, whereas personality type mainly influences the depth of reasoning, argumentation, and reflective thinking rather than students' initial understanding of mathematical problems. ABSTRAK Kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis merupakan salah satu kompetensi penting yang perlu dikembangkan dalam pembelajaran abad ke-21. Namun, kemampuan tersebut masih relatif rendah dan dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor, di antaranya tipe kepribadian siswa serta pendekatan pembelajaran yang digunakan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan profil kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa berkepribadian introvert dan ekstrovert dalam menyelesaikan soal berbasis etnomatematika legenda Sumur Giling Lamongan melalui pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL). Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas empat siswa kelas VIII MTs Ma’arif 15 Tarbiyatul Huda Sendang Duwur yang dipilih secara purposive sampling, yaitu dua siswa berkepribadian introvert dan dua siswa berkepribadian ekstrovert dengan kemampuan matematika yang relatif setara. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui angket tipe kepribadian, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis, wawancara semi-terstruktur, dan dokumentasi. Analisis data menggunakan model Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña yang meliputi kondensasi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan, sedangkan keabsahan data diperoleh melalui triangulasi teknik dan member check. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa berkepribadian introvert mampu memenuhi seluruh indikator berpikir kritis menurut Facione, yaitu interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, dan self-regulation. Sementara itu, siswa berkepribadian ekstrovert hanya memenuhi indikator interpretation, analysis, dan inference, sedangkan indikator evaluation, explanation, dan self-regulation belum terpenuhi secara optimal. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa integrasi CTL dengan etnomatematika legenda Sumur Giling Lamongan mampu memfasilitasi pemahaman konsep matematika secara kontekstual, sedangkan perbedaan tipe kepribadian lebih memengaruhi kedalaman penalaran, kemampuan memberikan argumentasi, dan refleksi terhadap proses berpikir daripada kemampuan memahami masalah.
Mathematical creative thinking profiles of sanguine students in solving open-ended social arithmetic problems Ajeng Kurnia Sari; Abdur Rohim; Khafidhoh Nurul Aini
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM) Vol 12 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM)
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/jpm.v12i2.25821

Abstract

Creative thinking is an essential competency in 21st-century mathematics education. However, observations and interviews with mathematics teachers at MTs Nurul Jadid Banjarmadu revealed that students still have difficulty solving open-ended problems that require diverse strategies and the development of creative ideas. Although personality type is known to influence creativity, studies examining the creative thinking profiles of sanguine students when solving open-ended social arithmetic problems remain limited. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach using the interactive analysis model. The subjects were two sanguine-type students (S-1 and S-2) selected from 26 seventh-grade students through the Florence Littauer personality questionnaire. Data were collected through social arithmetic open-ended tests and semi-structured interviews, and then analyzed using four creative thinking indicators: fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Method triangulation was conducted by comparing the participants' written responses with their interview explanations. The findings indicate that sanguine students met the fluency indicator by generating four valid answer pairs and the flexibility indicator by using two different solution strategies. However, neither subject demonstrated originality, as they relied on common strategies, nor did they demonstrate elaboration, due to incomplete verification of solution steps. The patterns observed in both participants indicate that spontaneity and enthusiasm can foster the generation of numerous ideas, whereas a focus limited to verification and detailed explanation can hinder elaboration during mathematical problem-solving. Therefore, teachers are encouraged to provide structured verification activities and guided solution frameworks to enhance originality and elaboration while maintaining fluency and flexibility.