Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Deauthorization of Hadith Studies on The Internet: Shift of Religious Authority in The Digital Age Lailiyatun Nafisah; Rahman Alwi; Rahman Rahman; Sukiyat; Saifuddin Yuliar
MUSLIM HERITAGE Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Muslim Heritage: Jurnal Dialog Islam dengan Realitas
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/muslimheritage.v10i1.10633

Abstract

The development of the internet has brought about changes in various aspects of life, including in the field of hadith studies. One of the highlights of this article is the concept of the authority of the actor who conveys the content of the hadith. In addition, people have come to rely on the internet as a place to find information, including about religion, in order to solve a problem. This study aims to find out how the phenomenon of deauthorization of hadith found on the internet by looking at the concept of authorization of hadith in the Islamic tradition. Deauthorization is a shift characterized by the birth of a new authority outside the established traditional authority. The approach of this study is a literature review using the method of data analysis in descriptive form. The results of this study show that digital technology has changed the transmission, access, and interpretation of hadith, indicating a shift from traditional authority to a participatory model and highlighting epistemological changes that broaden hadith studies while encouraging more adaptive hadith learning strategies in the digital age.   Abstrak Perkembangan internet telah melahirkan berbagai perubahan dalam berbagai aspek kehidupan, termasuk dalam bidang kajian hadis. Salah satu yang menjadi sorotan dalam artikel ini adalah konsep otoritas pelaku yang menyampaikan kandungan hadis. Selain itu, masyarakat telah mengandalkan internet sebagai tempat untuk mencari informasi, termasuk tentang agama, dalam rangka menyelesaikan suatu permasalahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana fenomena deauthorisasi hadis yang terdapat di internet dengan melihat konsep otorisasi hadis dalam tradisi Islam. Deauthorisasi adalah pergeseran yang ditandai dengan lahirnya otoritas baru di luar otoritas tradisional yang sudah mapan. Pendekatan penelitian ini adalah tinjauan literatur dengan menggunakan metode analisis data dalam bentuk deskriptif. hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa teknologi digital telah mengubah transmisi, akses, dan interpretasi hadis, yang mengindikasikan adanya pergeseran dari otoritas tradisional ke model partisipatoris dan menyoroti perubahan epistemologis yang memperluas studi hadis sekaligus mendorong strategi pembelajaran hadis yang lebih adaptif di era digital. Keywords: Deauthorization; Hadith; Religious Authority; Digital Age
Deauthorization of Hadith Studies on The Internet: Shift of Religious Authority in The Digital Age Lailiyatun Nafisah; Rahman Alwi; Rahman Rahman; Sukiyat; Saifuddin Yuliar
MUSLIM HERITAGE Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Muslim Heritage: Jurnal Dialog Islam dengan Realitas
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/muslimheritage.v10i1.10633

Abstract

The development of the internet has brought about changes in various aspects of life, including in the field of hadith studies. One of the highlights of this article is the concept of the authority of the actor who conveys the content of the hadith. In addition, people have come to rely on the internet as a place to find information, including about religion, in order to solve a problem. This study aims to find out how the phenomenon of deauthorization of hadith found on the internet by looking at the concept of authorization of hadith in the Islamic tradition. Deauthorization is a shift characterized by the birth of a new authority outside the established traditional authority. The approach of this study is a literature review using the method of data analysis in descriptive form. The results of this study show that digital technology has changed the transmission, access, and interpretation of hadith, indicating a shift from traditional authority to a participatory model and highlighting epistemological changes that broaden hadith studies while encouraging more adaptive hadith learning strategies in the digital age.   Abstrak Perkembangan internet telah melahirkan berbagai perubahan dalam berbagai aspek kehidupan, termasuk dalam bidang kajian hadis. Salah satu yang menjadi sorotan dalam artikel ini adalah konsep otoritas pelaku yang menyampaikan kandungan hadis. Selain itu, masyarakat telah mengandalkan internet sebagai tempat untuk mencari informasi, termasuk tentang agama, dalam rangka menyelesaikan suatu permasalahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana fenomena deauthorisasi hadis yang terdapat di internet dengan melihat konsep otorisasi hadis dalam tradisi Islam. Deauthorisasi adalah pergeseran yang ditandai dengan lahirnya otoritas baru di luar otoritas tradisional yang sudah mapan. Pendekatan penelitian ini adalah tinjauan literatur dengan menggunakan metode analisis data dalam bentuk deskriptif. hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa teknologi digital telah mengubah transmisi, akses, dan interpretasi hadis, yang mengindikasikan adanya pergeseran dari otoritas tradisional ke model partisipatoris dan menyoroti perubahan epistemologis yang memperluas studi hadis sekaligus mendorong strategi pembelajaran hadis yang lebih adaptif di era digital. Keywords: Deauthorization; Hadith; Religious Authority; Digital Age
Reconstruction Of The Jurisprudential-Maqāṣidī Method In The Division Of Joint Property In Polygamous Marriages In Indonesia Kemas Muhammad Gemilang; Jumni Nelli; Rahman Alwi; Mohammad Abdi Almaktsur; Mardiana Mardiana; Alief Akbar Musaddad
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 5 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i5.21205

Abstract

The division of joint marital property in polygamous marriages cannot always be resolved by applying the chronology of marriage as stated in Article 94 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). In practice, assets may be mixed, transformed, reinvested, increased in value, or used across more than one household, while the parties’ contributions may be material or non-material. This article reconstructs a jurisprudential-maqāṣidī method for adjudicating such disputes by systematizing judicial reasoning and evaluating it through maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. This normative legal research applies statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of the Marriage Law, the KHI, and selected court decisions on joint property and polygamy; secondary materials consist of scholarly works on marital property, judicial discretion, substantive justice, and Islamic family-law reform. Legal materials were collected through document study and analyzed qualitatively-prescriptively by identifying legal norms, mapping legally relevant facts, extracting ratio decidendi, comparing patterns of judicial reasoning, and testing those patterns against maqāṣidī parameters. The analysis shows that Article 94 KHI provides a necessary normative foundation but not an operational method for tracing transformed or mixed assets and evaluating unequal contributions. Judicial reasoning, particularly Supreme Court Decision No. 266 K/AG/2010, demonstrates that a mechanical one-half division may be corrected when evidence shows substantial inequality in contribution and fulfilment of maintenance obligations. This article reconstructs those dispersed considerations into five stages: normative classification, asset tracing and transformation analysis, contribution assessment, controlled correction of mechanical division, and maqāṣidī justification. The novelty lies not merely in combining jurisprudence and maqāṣid, but in converting case-specific judicial considerations into a systematic decision-making procedure with objective limits on judicial discretion.
Reconstruction Of The Jurisprudential-Maqāṣidī Method In The Division Of Joint Property In Polygamous Marriages In Indonesia Kemas Muhammad Gemilang; Jumni Nelli; Rahman Alwi; Mohammad Abdi Almaktsur; Mardiana Mardiana; Alief Akbar Musaddad
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 5 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i5.21205

Abstract

The division of joint marital property in polygamous marriages cannot always be resolved by applying the chronology of marriage as stated in Article 94 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). In practice, assets may be mixed, transformed, reinvested, increased in value, or used across more than one household, while the parties’ contributions may be material or non-material. This article reconstructs a jurisprudential-maqāṣidī method for adjudicating such disputes by systematizing judicial reasoning and evaluating it through maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. This normative legal research applies statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of the Marriage Law, the KHI, and selected court decisions on joint property and polygamy; secondary materials consist of scholarly works on marital property, judicial discretion, substantive justice, and Islamic family-law reform. Legal materials were collected through document study and analyzed qualitatively-prescriptively by identifying legal norms, mapping legally relevant facts, extracting ratio decidendi, comparing patterns of judicial reasoning, and testing those patterns against maqāṣidī parameters. The analysis shows that Article 94 KHI provides a necessary normative foundation but not an operational method for tracing transformed or mixed assets and evaluating unequal contributions. Judicial reasoning, particularly Supreme Court Decision No. 266 K/AG/2010, demonstrates that a mechanical one-half division may be corrected when evidence shows substantial inequality in contribution and fulfilment of maintenance obligations. This article reconstructs those dispersed considerations into five stages: normative classification, asset tracing and transformation analysis, contribution assessment, controlled correction of mechanical division, and maqāṣidī justification. The novelty lies not merely in combining jurisprudence and maqāṣid, but in converting case-specific judicial considerations into a systematic decision-making procedure with objective limits on judicial discretion.