Muhammad Ridwan
Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Zakat Distribution to Reach the Most Vulnerable Communities in Padangsidimpuan City: Perspective of Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah Al-Syāṭibī Purnama Hidayah Harahap; Muhammad Ridwan; Uswatun Hasanah
El-Sirry: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Sosial Vol 3, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : UIN SYEKH ALI HASAN AHMAD ADDARY PADANGSIDIMPUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/ejhis.v3i2.17549

Abstract

In the perspective of Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah according to Al-Syāṭibī, zakat plays a central role in realizing the benefits of the ummah (jalb al-maṣāliḥ) and preventing harm (dar' al-mafāsid). However, the practice of distributing zakat in Padangsidimpuan City still faces various obstacles, such as limited mustachik data, long bureaucracy, and geographical barriers, so that the benefits of zakat are not optimal for vulnerable groups. Along with the development of technology, various innovations have begun to be implemented to increase the effectiveness, transparency, and accountability of zakat distribution. This study uses a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach to analyze the role of zakat distribution innovation in increasing accessibility and efficiency in accordance with Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah. Data was collected through observations, in-depth interviews with zakat institutions, and focused group discussions with beneficiaries and stakeholders. The results of the study show that the use of technology, such as digital zakat platforms, mustahik identification systems, and mobile-based disbursement, significantly increases the accessibility, efficiency, and transparency of zakat distribution. These findings reflect efforts to protect property (ḥifẓ al-māl), and are reinforced by community-based participatory models and collaboration of local stakeholders that support the sustainability and accountability of zakat management.
Customary Compromise and Substantive Justice: The Dalihan Na Tolu Kinship System in Family Dispute Resolution in Padangsidimpuan City from the Perspective of Sadd al-Dharī‘ah Adi Syahputra Sirait; Mardona Siregar; Muhammad Ridwan
Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan
Publisher : Hukum Keluarga Islam IAIN LANGSA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/qadha.v13i1.14496

Abstract

The Dalihan Na Tolu system plays a dominant role in resolving family disputes within Batak society and often generates customary compromise practices that may overlook the principle of substantive justice. This study analyzes the position and influence of the Dalihan Na Tolu kinship system in contemporary family law dispute resolution and examines its compatibility with Islamic law and positive law through the sadd al dhari’ah approach. This research adopts a qualitative method combined with a sociological approach. The qualitative approach is used to explore social realities and legal practices in society, while the sociological approach examines the interaction between customary law, Islamic law, and state law in family dispute resolution. Data were collected through interviews with customary and religious leaders, field observations, and document analysis of relevant legal materials and scholarly works. The data analysis applies the sadd al dhari’ah framework to identify potential harm in customary-based dispute resolution practices under the Dalihan Na Tolu system. The findings show that the dominance of this kinship system in family disputes creates both support and criticism because it often prioritizes familial compromise and clan harmony over the protection of women’s and children’s rights as guaranteed by Islamic law and national law. This is particularly evident in divorce and inheritance cases. Furthermore, women often face limited participation in customary deliberation due to male-dominated authority structures within the Dalihan Na Tolu system. The study proposes normative reforms, including the development of customary-based dispute resolution guidelines aligned with Islamic and national law, increased female participation in deliberative processes, and stronger involvement of religious and state institutions in mediation.