Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Journal of Social Science Utilizing Technology
Olivier Sossou
Université de Parakou
Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Mitigating Climate Change through Agroecological Innovations: A Comparative Study on Global Adaptation Strategies I Made Murdana; Olivier Sossou; Victor Hernandez
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/ijmsa.v3i1.3277

Abstract

Background. Climate change poses significant challenges to agricultural systems worldwide, particularly in vulnerable regions. The adoption of agroecological innovations has been recognized as a promising solution to mitigate the effects of climate change and improve the resilience of food systems. These innovations integrate ecological principles into agricultural practices, promoting sustainability, biodiversity, and climate adaptation. However, the effectiveness of these strategies varies across different global contexts, depending on regional environmental, economic, and social conditions. Purpose. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of global agroecological adaptation strategies, evaluating their effectiveness in mitigating climate change impacts. It seeks to identify the key factors that contribute to the success or failure of these strategies and to propose recommendations for scaling agroecological practices to address climate challenges. Method. The research employs a comparative case study approach, analyzing agroecological initiatives from diverse regions, including sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America. Data were collected through field visits, interviews with local farmers and experts, and secondary sources such as government reports and academic literature. Results. The findings highlight significant differences in the adoption and outcomes of agroecological practices, with successful strategies often involving community participation, knowledge sharing, and context-specific adaptations. Conclusion. Agroecological innovations offer a viable pathway for climate change mitigation, but their effectiveness depends on local adaptation strategies. Future efforts should focus on strengthening community engagement and policy support for scaling these practices.
Digital Surveillance, Privacy Rights, and State Power: Rethinking Legal Safeguards in the Age of Big Data Awan Karunia Sanjaya; Ruruk Ronting; Olivier Sossou
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v4i2.3692

Abstract

Background. The rapid advancement of digital surveillance technologies in the age of big data has raised significant concerns regarding privacy rights and state power. As governments and corporations increasingly rely on digital surveillance to enhance security and gather data, the implications for personal privacy have become more complex. While legal frameworks have been established to protect privacy, they often fail to keep pace with the rapid technological evolution, leaving gaps in safeguarding individuals' rights. Purpose. This research explores the tension between digital surveillance, privacy rights, and state power, critically examining the legal safeguards that exist to protect privacy in this context. The study aims to assess the adequacy of current legal frameworks in balancing the demands of security with the protection of individual freedoms. Method. A qualitative methodology was employed, involving an analysis of international legal documents, case law, and expert interviews. Results. The findings indicate that existing laws, while addressing privacy to some extent, often lack enforceability and fail to effectively limit state surveillance powers. Conclusion. This study concludes that stronger, more adaptive legal frameworks are necessary to ensure privacy protection while accommodating legitimate state surveillance needs. The research contributes to the growing discourse on the intersection of law, technology, and human rights, offering recommendations for reforming legal safeguards in the digital age.
Regulating the Black Box: A Comparative Policy Analysis of National Strategies for Governing Artificial Intelligence and Upholding Human Rights Kouadio Koffi; Olivier Sossou; Aminatou Agounke
Journal of Social Science Utilizing Technology Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/jssut.v4i1.2909

Abstract

Background. The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has raised significant concerns regarding its potential impacts on human rights, ethics, and governance. While AI promises advancements in efficiency and innovation, its opaque decision-making processes, often referred to as the "black box" problem, create challenges for regulators aiming to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability. This study conducts a comparative policy analysis of national strategies for governing AI, with a particular focus on how different countries address human rights concerns within their AI regulatory frameworks. Purpose. The research aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of existing AI governance models and propose best practices for integrating human rights principles into AI regulation. Method. Using a qualitative approach, this study analyzes AI policies from the European Union, the United States, China, and India. Results. The findings reveal significant variations in the approach to regulating AI, with the EU emphasizing transparency and ethical guidelines, while countries like China prioritize state control and surveillance. Conclusion. The study concludes that a balanced approach, which incorporates human rights safeguards alongside technological innovation, is crucial for the responsible development and deployment of AI. The paper recommends stronger international cooperation and the establishment of a global framework for AI governance.
Co-Authors Aminatou Agounke Awan Karunia Sanjaya I Made Murdana Kouadio Koffi Ruruk Ronting Victor Hernandez