Sumarno Sumarno
Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Kota Medan, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Analysis of Online Gambling with the Higgs Domino Island Online Game Mode According to The Perspective Criminal Law in Indonesia Ahmad Novaisal; Sumarno Sumarno; Firman Halawa
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.2074

Abstract

This study discusses the legal analysis of online gambling practices using the Higgs Domino Islands game from the perspective of criminal law in Indonesia. The purpose of the study is to assess the extent to which applicable laws and regulations are able to ensnare gambling activities camouflaged through digital game media. The research method uses a normative juridical approach by examining the provisions of the Criminal Code, Law Number 7 of 1974 concerning the Regulation of Gambling, and Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. The results of the study indicate that the Higgs Domino Islands game has characteristics that fulfill the elements of gambling because it involves betting, opportunities, and real economic benefits. However, law enforcement is still not optimal due to limited regulations that do not explicitly regulate the form of digital gambling and technical obstacles in proving electronic transactions. Legal updates and increased capacity of law enforcement officers are needed to be able to keep up with the development of digital technology. This research is expected to contribute to strengthening criminal law policies in facing the challenges of online gambling in the digital era.
Legal Certainty Regrading the Authority to Calculate State Losses in Corruption Cases Sakramen Sembiring; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Sumarno Sumarno
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v5i2.2656

Abstract

This study aims to examine legal certainty concerning the authority to calculate state financial losses in corruption cases, while also assessing the implications arising from overlapping institutional mandates within judicial practice. The central issue lies in regulatory inconsistencies and differing interpretations regarding which institutions are authorized to determine state losses, often involving the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK), the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP), as well as independent experts. This research employs a normative legal method, utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by an analysis of court decisions and relevant legal literature.The findings reveal that the absence of clear and consistent regulations governing the authority to assess state losses contributes significantly to legal uncertainty in the evidentiary process of corruption cases. Divergent perspectives between law enforcement agencies and auditing institutions lead to inconsistent judicial decisions, thereby undermining the principles of legal certainty and justice. Furthermore, reliance on loss calculations produced by different institutions without uniform standards raises doubts regarding the validity and reliability of the quantified state losses used as the basis for criminal sentencing. In conclusion, regulatory harmonization and a clear delineation of institutional authority are urgently required to ensure legal certainty in the enforcement of anti-corruption laws. Such measures are essential to promote a fair, transparent, and accountable judicial system.