p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Independent
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Liability for Prestige Brand Parody for Ads Dhevi Nayasari; Wardatun Nabilah; Joejoen Tjahjani; Velinsia Cindy Agustin
Jurnal Independent Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Independent
Publisher : Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/ji.v14i1.409

Abstract

Parody of prestige brands in the context of commercial advertising has sparked complex legal debates, particularly regarding the boundary between freedom of expression and trademark protection. Prestige brands, as brands with a high reputation and strong symbolic value, are vulnerable to forms of exploitation that can harm their image and economic value. Based on the background above, the author proposes the following problem formulation: first, what is the legal responsibility of parody advertisers towards prestige brands? And second, how is the legal protection of prestige brands that are parodied for advertisement purposes? This research employs a normative legal type, with a statutory approach. The legal materials used are primary legal materials including: Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications, and Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. From the research results, it can be concluded that: the use of famous brands in parodies is not automatically protected by freedom of expression if the purpose is commercial and can mislead consumers. The perpetrators of the parody can be held legally accountable if the parody causes damage to the owner of the prestige brand, even though parody is a form of freedom of expression, its use must heed legal provisions so as not to violate the exclusive rights of the brand owner. The owner of the prestige brand has the right to demand the cessation of violations and compensation for the economic and moral damages incurred.
Legal Rules for Illegal Logging Perpetrators in Conservation Forests Joejoen Tjahjani; Mar'atul Mochtar; Dhevi Nayasari Sastradinata; Aisyah Nur Mahdiyah
Jurnal Independent Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Independent
Publisher : Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/ji.v14i1.411

Abstract

Illegal logging in conservation forests is an environmental crime that damages the ecosystem and the law. Illegal logging in conservation forest areas is a serious violation of forestry law provisions in Indonesia that has the potential to damage the ecosystem and forest conservation functions. Based on the description above, the problems to be studied in the study are: legal protection of conservation forests in laws and regulations in Indonesia and legal sanctions against perpetrators of illegal logging in conservation forests. The research method uses a normative juridical legal research type, so the approach used is the statute approach which includes primary legal materials: Law Number 18 of 2013 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction, Forestry Law Number 41 of 2013, Government Regulation Number 108 of 2015 also strengthens forest protection by prohibiting logging without a permit. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the Enforcement of Legal Protection against conservation forests and legal sanctions against perpetrators of illegal logging in conservation forests is not only aimed at providing a deterrent effect through criminal sanctions and fines, but also maintaining the sustainability of forest functions as areas for preserving biodiversity and natural resources. Cases of illegal logging in conservation forests demonstrate the importance of synergy between law enforcement officers and communities to optimize forest protection and eradicate illegal logging practices.