Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Mamangan Social Science Journal
Valentina Moiso
Assistant Professor in Sociology, Dept. of Cultures, Politics and Society - University of Turin, Italy
Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Collaboration Of Penta Helix Model Towards The Smart City Program In South Bangka Regency Dicky Amrullah; Harits Hijrah Wicaksana; Agung Edi Rustanto; Hidayat Sutawijaya; Valentina Moiso; Micaela Mazzei
Jurnal Mamangan Vol 13, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan Accredited 2 (SK Dirjen Ristek Dikti No. 0173/C3/DT
Publisher : LPPM Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/mamangan.v13i2.8474

Abstract

As a form of local government commitment in supporting the national development agenda towards a smart city, the South Bangka Regency Government is accelerating development by implementing a design for the use of information technology for the development of South Bangka as a smart city. This study applies the penta helix collaboration model in the smart city program in South Bangka Regency. The penta helix model involves five main elements, namely government, community, private sector/business actors, academics, and mass media. This study aims to analyze the direction of smart city policy in South Bangka Regency and analyze the penta helix collaboration model in the smart city program in South Bangka Regency. This research method uses a descriptive qualitative approach by conducting in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentation studies with informants. The results of the study indicate that effective collaboration between elements of the penta helix model can increase efficiency, improve public services, and improve community welfare. However, the conclusions of this study also identify a number of challenges, such as lack of coordination between sectors and limited resources. Recommendations put forward include strengthening the regulatory framework, strengthening stakeholder coordination, and increasing human resource capacity, as well as developing information technology infrastructure. This study is expected to contribute to the literature on the implementation of smart cities in other regions with similar characteristics.
Normative Analysis of Murder Case Decisions in Surabaya: Case Study Number 454/Pid.B/2024/PNNormative Analysis of Murder Case Decisions in Surabaya: Case Study Number 454/Pid.B/2024/PN Rio Armanda Agustian; Valentina Moiso
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.7293

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of criminal law in murder cases with a focus on the decision of case Number 454/Pid.B/2024/PN in Surabaya. This case involves the application of Articles 338 and 340 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) related to unplanned murder and premeditated murder. This study uses normative legal research methods with a legislative approach and a case approach. The results of the study show that the judge has carefully considered the existing evidence and sentenced in accordance with the applicable legal provisions. Although the defendant claimed self-defense, the judge considered that there was not enough evidence to support the claim. The impact of the verdict on the perpetrator provides a deterrent effect and serves as a warning to the public about the severe legal consequences for the crime of murder. Meanwhile, although the victim's family is satisfied with the court's decision, they still feel a loss that cannot be replaced by any punishment. This study concludes that even though the judicial process has been carried out in accordance with the applicable procedures, there is still room for improvement in terms of the time given to the defense and attention to the psychological condition of the perpetrator
The Meaning of Restorative Justice by Structural Power in The Legal System in Indonesia Steinly Suwanto; Maulana Malik Ibrohim; Fendi Setyawan; M. Arief Amrullah; Valentina Moiso
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v25i1.7370

Abstract

Legal enforcement systems globally are frequently situated within a dichotomous debate between retributive justice, which views law as an instrument of punishment, and restorative justice, which regards law as a mechanism for restoring social harmony. Both perspectives contribute significant insights; however, contemporary legal discourse increasingly gravitates toward restorative justice as a model considered more congruent with current societal conditions. Despite this trend, numerous scholars contend that restorative justice remains a utopian construct, whose practical implementation is often unrealistic and prone to generating institutional resistance. In Indonesia, this tension is reflected in the Regulation of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia No. 15 of 2020, the Indonesian National Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021, and the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2014, each articulating restorative justice through the lens of their respective institutional mandates and gravitating towards administrative issues rather than the essence of law enforcement. This research employs a literature-based and regulatory analysis to examine the implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia. The study concludes that the current application of restorative justice in Indonesia remains misaligned with the fundamental principles of restorative justice as theorized in the broader academic discourse.
Co-Authors Agung Edi Rustanto Dicky Amrullah Fendi Setyawan Hidayat Sutawijaya M. Arief Amrullah Maulana Malik Ibrohim Micaela Mazzei Rio Armanda Agustian Steinly Suwanto Wicaksana, Harits Hijrah