Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia International Journal of Religion Education and Law International Journal of Sociology and Law AR-RUMMAN: Journal of Education and Learning Evaluation Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities
Abdul Halim
UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Nursing Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Reinterpretasi Nafkah Madhiyah Dalam Perspektif Maqasid Al-Syariah: Analisis Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Perceraian di Pengadilan Jambi Azharudin Azharudin; Hasbi Umar; Sayuti Sayuti; Abdul Halim
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7754

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mereinterpretasi konsep nafkah madhiyah dalam perspektif Maqasid al-Syariah serta menganalisis implikasinya terhadap pola penetapan putusan hakim dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Jambi. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh adanya kesenjangan antara ketentuan normatif yang mengatur kewajiban nafkah madhiyah dengan penerapannya dalam praktik peradilan yang menunjukkan variasi putusan, rendahnya nilai nafkah, serta lemahnya perlindungan ekonomi terhadap perempuan pasca perceraian. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan sosio-legal, dokumentasi putusan, wawancara semi-terstruktur dengan hakim dan aparat peradilan, serta observasi terbatas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nafkah madhiyah secara normatif merupakan hak legal istri yang dijamin oleh syariat dan hukum positif, namun implementasinya sering kali belum efektif karena faktor budaya hukum, lemahnya pembuktian kemampuan ekonomi suami, serta tidak adanya standar baku dalam penetapan besaran nafkah. Melalui perspektif Maqasid al-Syariah, nafkah madhiyah harus dipahami sebagai instrumen perlindungan kemaslahatan perempuan (ḥifẓ al-nafs) dan harta (ḥifẓ al-māl). Penelitian ini menghasilkan model reinterpretasi nafkah madhiyah berbasis Maqasid yang menekankan keadilan substantif, kepastian hukum, serta mekanisme pelaksanaan yang responsif terhadap kebutuhan perempuan pasca perceraian. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini memberikan dasar teoritis dan rekomendatif untuk standarisasi putusan nafkah madhiyah di Pengadilan Agama Jambi.
Sanksi Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dalam Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme dan Hukum Pidana Islam Sudiro Sudiro; Ruslan Abd Gani; Rahmi Hidayati; Abdul Halim
Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/helium.v2i2.6775

Abstract

The crime of terrorism is a crime that receives very serious attention in terms of its handling. This is proven by the creation of a complete explanation of the sanctions for perpetrators of criminal acts of terrorism both in Islamic law and in Positive Law. This thesis discusses the Sanctions for Criminal Acts of Terrorism in the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism and Islamic Criminal Law. The method used in this research is library research. Research refers to sources including: the Quran, Hadith, Laws, Books, Theses and opinions or statements of Legal Experts. The Crime of Terrorism in Islamic Criminal Law is an act that violates sharia whose sanctions are equated with jarimah hirābah. Meanwhile, in Positive Law, sanctions for criminal acts of terrorism are regulated in Law Number 5 of 2018, the sanctions of which are in the form of imprisonment of at least 4 years and a maximum of 20 years and the death penalty.
Collaborative Counterterrorism Governance and Islamic Criminal Law: Evidence from Jambi, Indonesia Nadi Chaidir; Ahmad Syukri; Yuliatin Yuliatin; Abdul Halim
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): November: International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v3i4.1044

Abstract

This study aims to analyze differing perceptions of terrorism between Islamic criminal law and Indonesian positive law and their implications for inter-institutional collaboration in Jambi, identify barriers to coordination between security and religious institutions, and examine the tension between repressive and deradicalization approaches. This research employs an empirical-juridical approach with qualitative methods. Primary data were obtained through in-depth interviews with the Jambi Regional Police, Densus 88, BNPT Jambi, FKPT Jambi, the Ministry of Religious Affairs, MUI, NU, Muhammadiyah, and Islamic boarding school leaders, supported by participatory observation. Secondary data included the Qur'an, Hadith, legislation, particularly Law No. 5 of 2018, classical jinayah texts, MUI fatwas, and academic literature. The analysis applies jarīmah ḥirābah, maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, particularly ḥifẓ al-nafs and ḥifẓ al-dīn, and siyāsah shar'iyyah. The findings show that divergent legal perceptions weaken collaboration, as Islamic criminal law emphasizes reconciliation (islāh) and repentance (taubat), while positive law prioritizes repression. Coordination remains suboptimal due to differing mandates, weak program synchronization, limited resources, and social stigma. The dominance of repression also limits policy effectiveness by neglecting ideological roots. Therefore, an integrative maqāṣid al-sharī'ah-based model combining law enforcement, prevention, and socio-religious rehabilitation is needed. The novelty lies in developing a local collaborative governance model integrating security and religious authorities functionally, normatively, and culturally.
Studi Sejarah Situs Bukit Siguntang Desa Muaro Sekalo, Kecamatan Sumay, Kabupaten Tebo, Jambi Shofiyah Shofiyah; Abdul Halim Havid; Fuad Rahman; Abdul Halim
AR-RUMMAN: Journal of Education and Learning Evaluation Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Juni 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/arrumman.v2i1.5994

Abstract

Kajian Sejarah Situs Bukit Siguntang di Desa Muaro Sekalo, Kecamatan Sumay, Kabupaten Tebo, Provinsi Jambi merupakan artikel ilmiah tentang kajian pustaka dalam lingkup bidang ilmu pengetahuan. Tujuan dari artikel ini adalah untuk menunjukkan nilai-nilai budaya dan sejarah yang terkandung di Situs Bukit Siguntang serta peran dan fungsinya dalam pengembangan sejarah lokal dan regional. Objek penelitian adalah pustaka daring, Naskah Kuno, Catatan Kuno dan situs Bukit Siguntang beserta seluruh unsur sejarah, budaya, dan fisik yang melekat padanya. Metode penelitian dengan pustaka risearch yang bersumber dari Naskah dan Catatan Kuno. Analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil dari artikel ini: 1) menunjukkan bahwa situs tersebut memiliki nilai sejarah dan budaya yang signifikan, terkait dengan peradaban Melayu dan Kerajaan Sriwijaya. 2) Penelitian ini mengungkap bahwa Bukit Siguntang merupakan pusat kegiatan keagamaan sejak abad ke-7 hingga abad ke-14 Masehi 3) temuan arkeologis seperti arca Buddha, prasasti, dan keramik kuno yang mendukung peran pentingnya dalam sejarah wilayah tersebut.
Criminal Law Policy Against Perpetrators of Hoarding of Basic Commodities from the Perspective of Indonesian Legislation and Islamic Law Padri Zelvian; Ruslan Abd Gani; Rahmi Hidayati; Abdul Halim; Ahmad Syukri
International Journal of Religion Education and Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/ijrael.v4i2.6941

Abstract

This study examines the legal policy regarding criminal sanctions against perpetrators of staple food hoarding in Indonesia, viewed from the perspective of national legislation and Islamic law. Staple food hoarding—defined as the act of storing goods in unreasonable quantities to create artificial scarcity and profit from price surges—is a serious threat to public welfare and market stability. In the Indonesian legal context, hoarding is regulated under Law Number 7 of 2014 on Trade, the Criminal Code (KUHP), and supporting regulations, which impose criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment and substantial fines. However, the enforcement of these sanctions faces practical challenges in terms of monitoring, proving intent, and preventing repeat violations. From the Islamic legal perspective, hoarding, known as ihtikār, is explicitly prohibited as it violates the principles of justice and public interest (maslahah). The Prophet Muhammad condemned hoarding, and Islamic jurisprudence empowers authorities to impose discretionary punishments (taʿzīr) to prevent social harm. The findings indicate a significant convergence between the objectives of national and Islamic law in protecting economic justice and consumer rights, though their normative foundations and enforcement mechanisms differ. This paper concludes that an integrative approach—combining formal criminal law enforcement with the ethical and moral values of Islam—can enhance the effectiveness of anti-hoarding policies. Recommendations include stronger market supervision, public education on ethical business conduct, collaboration with religious institutions, and consistent law enforcement.
Co-Authors Abdul Halim Havid Ahmad Syukri Azharudin Azharudin Fuad Rahman Hasbi Umar Nadi Chaidir Padri Zelvian Rahmi Hidayati Ruslan Abd Gani Sayuti Sayuti Shofiyah Shofiyah Sudiro Sudiro Yuliatin Yuliatin