Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal KIK-AK
Nina Zainab
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terhadap Izin Pertambangan Dengan Modus Gratifikasi Dalam Bentuk Asuransi Chika dWI Imelia; Nina Zainab
Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian dan Anti Korupsi Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Oktober 2024
Publisher : Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian dan Anti Korupsi Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/ybxyze73

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime. Corruption in Indonesia is increasing every year. The increase in corruption cases in Indonesia is increasingly specific, the mode used by each perpetrator is different. Like a disease, the symptoms of corruption in Indonesia start from the elitist stage where mega corruption occurs in the government. This writing focuses on Supreme Court Decision Number 2633 K/PID.SUS/2018, in which Nur Alam as Governor of Southeast Sulawesi for the period 2008-2017 committed a criminal act of corruption by accepting gratuities in the form of insurance for mining licenses. The method used in this writing is normative juridical with a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. With the aim of measuring the equivalence of the punishment received by the convicted person based on the theory of legal certainty, the principle of legality, and the theory of crime and punishment From the decision that the author examines, it can be concluded that the return of assets resulting from corruption with the mode of gratification in the form of insurance is the return of goods that have economic value obtained from the proceeds of corruption in the form of several insurance policies. In this case, Nur Alam's insurance account must be frozen. The type of punishment for returning assets resulting from corruption is the main punishment consisting of imprisonment and fines, as well as additional punishment, namely paying restitution or taking assets worth restitution and revoking political rights.
EKSPLORASI ISU ETIKA DAN SOSIAL DALAM IMPLEMENTASI POLISI ROBOT OTONOM UNTUK PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Rabiah Al Adawiah; Nina Zainab
Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian dan Anti Korupsi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian dan Anti Korupsi Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/bdsjbc85

Abstract

The implementation of Autonomous Robot Police (e.g., i-K9 and humanoid robots) by the Indonesian National Police (Polri) marks a new era of smart policing. This research aims to critically explore the pressing ethical and social issues arising from the automation of law enforcement in the Indonesian context. Through a qualitative approach and conceptual analysis, the study identifies three main issue clusters: (1) Ethics of Accountability, focusing on the dilemma of criminal liability when autonomous robots make mistakes; (2) Social Issues of Public Trust, examining how AI surveillance affects the police's sense of security and legitimacy; and (3) Algorithmic Bias, emphasizing the potential for discrimination hidden in training data. It finds that despite offering operational efficiency, Autonomous Robot Police raises serious normative uncertainties, particularly regarding the transparency of decisions and the protection of public privacy under the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE). Key recommendations include the establishment of comprehensive regulations, human resource training, and the development of AI governance that prioritizes the values ​​of social justice
PROSES PERAMPASAN ASET TANPA MELALUI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN PIDANA OLEH KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK) TERHADAP HASIL TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Donasto Samosir; Nina Zainab
Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian dan Anti Korupsi Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Oktober 2026
Publisher : Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian dan Anti Korupsi Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/33byw577

Abstract

Corruption is a criminal act that causes state financial losses and hinders national development. The return of assets resulting from corruption often encounters obstacles when the perpetrator dies, flees, or cannot be prosecuted criminally, making the mechanism for asset confiscation based on a court decision less effective. This study aims to analyze the legal status of asset confiscation without a criminal court decision by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) regarding the proceeds of corruption and its implementation mechanism in the Indonesian legal system. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results show that the concept of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture has gained legitimacy through the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, which Indonesia has ratified, but its regulation in national law is not yet comprehensive. The authority of the KPK is still limited to tracing, confiscating, and securing assets, while permanent confiscation without a criminal verdict does not have an explicit legal basis. Current mechanisms only utilize temporary confiscation instruments, civil lawsuits, and provisions on money laundering. This study concludes that it is necessary to establish special regulations regarding the confiscation of assets without a criminal conviction to support the effective recovery of state losses while still ensuring legal certainty, justice, and protection of human rights.
Co-Authors Chika dWI Imelia Donasto Samosir Rabiah Al Adawiah