Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial
Juanda Juanda
Universitas Esa Unggul
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Penegakan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 868/Pid.B/2021/PN Jkt. Sel) Redito Triana Ari Yulianto; Juanda Juanda
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 4 Nomor 1 February - May 2
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v4i1.455

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penegakan hukum dalam Putusan Nomor 868/Pid.B/2021/PN Jkt.Sel berdasarkan sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia serta menilai apakah putusan tersebut telah mencerminkan nilai keadilan dalam penegakan hukum pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Bahan hukum yang digunakan meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, buku, dan jurnal ilmiah yang dianalisis secara kualitatif menggunakan teori penegakan hukum Soerjono Soekanto, prinsip equality before the law, konsep selective law enforcement, dan teori keadilan Gustav Radbruch. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses penegakan hukum telah dilaksanakan sesuai tahapan sistem peradilan pidana, mulai dari penyidikan hingga putusan pengadilan. Namun, majelis hakim menerapkan alasan pembenar berdasarkan Pasal 49 KUHP sehingga para terdakwa dilepaskan dari segala tuntutan hukum. Pertimbangan hakim belum menguraikan secara komprehensif prinsip legalitas, nesesitas, proporsionalitas, dan akuntabilitas penggunaan kekuatan oleh aparat kepolisian, sehingga menimbulkan indikasi selective law enforcement dalam penerapan alasan pembenar. Putusan tersebut telah memberikan kepastian hukum, tetapi belum sepenuhnya mencerminkan keadilan substantif karena keseimbangan antara perlindungan terhadap terdakwa, hak korban, dan kepentingan masyarakat belum dipertimbangkan secara proporsional. Oleh karena itu, penerapan alasan pembenar harus dilakukan secara lebih objektif, konsisten, dan berorientasi pada prinsip equality before the law.
Enforcement of Election Administrators' Code of Ethics: Evaluating DKPP Institutional Reform After the 2024 Election Irmanjaya Thaher; Juanda Juanda
Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): HAKAMAIN: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Publisher : Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57255/hakamain.v3i2.1776

Abstract

This study examines the enforcement of the code of ethics for election administrators in Indonesia by evaluating the institutional role of the Honorary Council of Election Organizers (Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu/DKPP) following the 2024 elections. The research focuses on the effectiveness of the DKPP in maintaining integrity, accountability, and public trust amid increasingly complex electoral challenges. Employing a normative legal research method, the study analyzes constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, DKPP decisions, Constitutional Court judgments, and relevant academic literature concerning electoral governance and institutional accountability. The findings demonstrate that the DKPP has played a significant role in enforcing ethical standards and safeguarding the professionalism of election administrators through adjudication of ethical violations. Nevertheless, several institutional constraints continue to limit its effectiveness, including overlapping authority with other electoral bodies, inconsistent implementation of ethical decisions, limited preventive oversight, and insufficient legal certainty regarding the binding force of its rulings. The experience of the 2024 elections further reveals the need to strengthen institutional coordination among electoral management bodies while enhancing transparency and procedural fairness in ethical adjudication. This study argues that comprehensive institutional reform should include clearer jurisdictional boundaries, stronger enforcement mechanisms, improved due process guarantees, expanded preventive ethics programs, and greater public participation in monitoring electoral integrity. Strengthening the DKPP through these reforms would reinforce democratic accountability, enhance the credibility of election administration, and contribute to a more transparent and trustworthy electoral system. Ultimately, effective ethical enforcement is indispensable for preserving constitutional democracy and ensuring that electoral governance operates in accordance with the principles of integrity, impartiality, and the rule of law.
Co-Authors Irmanjaya Thaher Redito Triana Ari Yulianto