Magdalena Litaay
Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Hasanuddin. Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan KM.10, Makassar 90245, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Diversity of marine tunicate from waters of Pannikiang Island and Badi Island of South Sulawesi, Indonesia Magdalena Litaay; Rensi Piri; Naspira Binti Jabir; Dody Priosambodo; Ayub Wirabuana Putra
Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity Vol. 24 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Society for Indonesian Biodiversity

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d240312

Abstract

Abstract. Litaay M, Piri R, Jabir NB, Priosambodo D, Putra AW. 2023. Diversity of marine tunicate from waters of Pannikiang Island and Badi Island of South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 24: 1431-1437. The number of tunicates is currently known for approximately 3000 species, but it is estimated that there are still 1000-2000 more species that have not been described globally. The Spermonde Archipelago in South Sulawesi is a habitat for various tunicates, but not all islands have been well explored. This study aims to expand the distribution map of tunicates in Spermonde Archipelago, especially in the two study islands (Pannikiang Island and Badi Island). The diversity of tunicates between two islands, which have different ecological conditions, is compared in this study. This study used a line transect method along 20 m with a combination of plots at a depth of 5 meters. A transect was applied at four different locations according to wind direction. All tunicates inside the transect were recorded, counted, and sub-sample were collected for identification purposes. The data obtained were analyzed using the diversity index (Chao-1, Shannon-wiener, Uniformity, and Dominance). There are a total of 35 species (24 species at Pannikiang Island and 18 at Badi Island). Nephtheis fascicularis, Didemnum molle, Clavelina robusta, and Polycarpa aurata can be found on both islands. The levels of diversity of the two islands differ with little in common.
Combining eDNA metabarcoding and conventional method in rapid screening of fish diversity in Maros-Pangkep Global Geopark, South Sulawesi, Indonesia AMBENG AMBENG; MUHAMMAD IQRAM; MAGDALENA LITAAY; ZOHRAH HASYIM; WILMA J. C. MOKA; GEORGINA MARIA TINUNGKI
Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity Vol. 25 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Society for Indonesian Biodiversity

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d250242

Abstract

Abstract. Ambeng, Iqram M, Litaay M, Hasyim Z, Moka WJC, Tinungki GM. 2024. Combining eDNA metabarcoding and conventional method in rapid screening of fish diversity in Maros-Pangkep Global Geopark, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 25: 819-828. A newly designated geopark by UNESCO, Maros-Pangkep Global Geopark, South Sulawesi, Indonesia owns great geodiversity, exceptional cultural heritage, and high biodiversity. However, the global biodiversity crisis that has hit the earth might also occur in Maros-Pangkep river systems, potentially threatening endemic freshwater fish and all other biota. It has been reported that there is high pressure on the environment along the watershed in the Maros-Pangkep rivers, including a high sedimentation rate downstream, which is linked to extreme erosion upstream and could eventually affect fish populations such as endemic ones. This should prompt a call for the authorities to build a strategy for monitoring and documenting aquatic biota such as fish to preserve biodiversity. Environmental DNA (eDNA) could be considered a method for monitoring fish species based on the DNA traces they shed in the water. Hence, this study aims to use eDNA to survey fish biodiversity in several rivers in the Maros-Pangkep Global Geopark and compare the result against the traditional gillnet method. The results showed that using two methods, 29 fish species in 19 families and 15 orders were obtained from the three rivers. Despite the majority of detected species, 25 species, as the result of using eDNA, 4 species were only detected using a traditional method which eDNA failed to identify. Among those species, several endemic and non-native species were successfully identified by either one or both methods. This could eventually be a suggestion for responsible authorities in biodiversity conservation to combine both approaches to monitor and conserve local biodiversity.