Bhisma Murti
Masters Program in Public Heath, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Effect of Depression, Stigma, and Peer Support Group, on the Quality of Life of People Living with HIV/AIDS in Solo Plus Peer Support Group, Surakarta, Central Java Yuli Lutfatul Fajriyah; Argyo Demartoto; Bhisma Murti
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (458.54 KB)

Abstract

Background: People Living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH) often face tough social problems, such as social rejection, stigma, and discrimination. Factors that affect PLWH’s quality of life may include psychosocial factors, economic status, immunological status, social support, and co-morbidity. This study aimed to determine the effect of depression, stigma, and peer support group on the quality of life of people living with HIV/AIDS in Solo Plus peer support group, Surakarta, Central Java.Subjects and Method: This was an analytic observational study with a cross-sectional design. The study was conducted at Solo plus peer support group, Surakarta, Central Java, from January to February 2018. A sample of 100 PLWH was selected for this study by simple random sampling. The dependent variable was a quality life of PLWH. The independent variables were healthy behavior, depression, family income, stigma, peer support, and social support. The data were collected by questionnaire and analyzed by path analysis.Results: Quality of life of PLWH increased with involvement in peer support group (b= 3.40; 95% CI= 0.71 to 6.10; p=0.001), social support (b= 0.70; 95% CI= 0.01 to 1.40; p=0.046), and healthy behavior (b=9.33; 95% CI= 5.30 to 13.36; p<0.001). Quality of life of PLWH decreased with stigma (b= -1.10; 95% CI=-1.84 to -0.36; p=0.003), and depression (b=-4.23; 95% CI=-6.62 to -1.83; p=0.001). Quality of life of PLWH was indirectly affected by income (b=0.06; 95% CI=10.14 to 18.61; p<0.001).Conclusion: Quality of life of PLWH is affected by healthy behavior, depression, stigma, peer support group, social support, and income.Keywords: Quality of life, PLWH, stigma, peer support group, social support Correspondence: Yuli Lutfatul Fajriyah. Masters Program in Public Health, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Jl. Ir. Sutami No. 36 A, 57126, Surakarta, Central Java. Email: yuli.luth.15@gmail.com. Mobile: +6285712200298.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2018), 3(1): 27-36https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2018.03.01.03 
Factors Affecting the Use of Visual Inspection Acetic Acid Test: Multilevel Analysis on the Contextual Effect of Health Center Siti Kholifah; Uki Retno Budihastuti; Bhisma Murti
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (419.272 KB)

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is one of the deadliest diseases that are a major cause of female mor­bidity and mortality in developing countries. This study aimed to determine the effect of health cen­ters on the use of visual inspection acetic acid (VIA) tests using social cognitive theory.Subjects and Method: This was an analytic observational study with a cross sectional design, conducted at 25 community health centers (Puskesmas) in Surakarta and Karanganyar, Central Ja­va, Indonesia. A sample of 225 married women at reproductive age was selected by random sam­pling. The dependent variable was the use of VIA test. The independent variables at level 1 were intention, self-efficacy, attitude, outcome expectation, imitation, type of contraceptive method, dis­tan­ce to health service, belief, and time to attend health services. Puskesmas was independent va­ri­able at level 2. The data were collected by questionnaire and analyzed by a multilevel logistic regre­s­sion.Results: The use of VIA tests was positively affected by intention (b= 1.25; 95% CI= 0.30 to -2.13; p= 0.010), attitude (b= 1.25; 95% CI = 0.30 to -2.13; p= 0.010), outcome expectation (b= 0.86; 95% CI= -0.89 to -0.19; p= 0.076), imitation (b= 1.58; 95% CI= 0.62 to 2.54; p= 0.001), intra ute­ri­ne device (b= 1.55; 95% CI= 0.65 to 2.45; p= 0.001), distance (b= 1.39; 95% CI= 0.44 to 2.34; p = 0.004), self-efficacy (b= 1.11; 95% CI= 0.26 to 1.97; p= 0.011), trust in health service (b= 1.84; 95% CI= 0.87 to 2.81; p <0.001), and spare time to attend health center (b = 0.76; 95% CI = -0.11 to 1.64; p= 0.090). Puskesmas accreditation status had contextual effect on the use of VIA tests with ICC= 30.68%.Conclusion: The use of VIA tests was positively affected by intention, attitude, outcome expec­ta­tion, imitation, intrauterine device, distance, self-efficacy, trust in health service, and spare time to attend health center. Puskesmas accreditation status had contextual effect on the use of VIA tests.Keywords: visual inspection acetic acid, social cognitive theory, multilevel analysisCorrespondence: Siti Kholifah. Masters Program in Public Heath, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: olifkholifah53@gmail.com. Mobile: 081575644051.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2019), 4(1): 1-11https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2019.04.01.01