Fathur Baldan Haramain
Al-Azhar University

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Islamic Law and Employee Marriage Restrictions : A Case Study of Bank BRI Parepare Mukarramah Mukarramah; Hasmia Wahyunisa; Ibnu Azka; Fathur Baldan Haramain
SHAHIH: Journal of Islamicate Multidisciplinary Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/shahih.v10i2.11684

Abstract

This study analyzes the employment policy prohibiting marriage during the contract period from an Islamic legal perspective, using a case study at the BRI Branch Office in Parepare. The policy, institutionally justified as a mechanism to ensure employee focus, discipline, and productivity, creates normative and ethical tensions for Muslim employees for whom marriage is a religious obligation and an integral aspect of moral life in Islam. This research uses qualitative method, collecting data through in-depth interviews with contract employees, human resource managers, and Islamic legal experts, complemented by document analysis of Islamic legal literature, fatwas, and relevant employment regulations. The data are analyzed through thematic and normative analysis. The findings indicate that the marriage prohibition policy lacks a strong justification for maslahah (public benefit) and is inconsistent with core Islamic legal principles, particularly the protection of religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn) and human dignity (karāmah al-insān). Rather than improving performance, such policies can actually cause psychological stress, moral conflict, and spiritual discomfort among employees, potentially damaging long-term productivity. This study contributes to the discourse on Islamic labor law by highlighting the limitations of contractual restrictions when they conflict with fundamental religious rights.
From Theocentric to Anthropocentric: Reconfiguring Tawḥīd in Contemporary Islamic Thought Saitul Mahtir; Fathorrahman; Aldi Hidayat; Ibnu Azka; Fathur Baldan Haramain
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/islimus.v10i1.12570

Abstract

This article examines the paradigm shift in tawḥīd from a theocentric–eschatological orientation to an anthropocentric framework by integrating the ideas of Ismāʿīl Rājī al-Fārūqī and Ḥasan Ḥanafī. Employing a qualitative, analytical–epistemological approach, Thomas S. Kuhn’s framework is used to trace the stages of normal science, anomaly, crisis, and paradigm revolution within the discourse of tawḥīd. Conceptual data are drawn from the principal works of both thinkers and analyzed comparatively and integratively. The findings reveal that the theocentric–eschatological paradigm continues to dominate Islamic scholarship and remains insufficiently responsive to contemporary humanitarian challenges. Al-Fārūqī’s tawḥīd-based principles, encompassing the unity of God, creation, truth–knowledge, life, humanity, and the reciprocity of reason and revelation, provide a multi-sectoral Islamic worldview. Meanwhile, Ḥanafī’s reinterpretation of classical kalām themes, particularly the doctrine of divine attributes, offers operational dimensions for transforming consciousness and guiding social praxis. Their integration produces an anthropocentric tawḥīd that supports the renewal of Islamic sciences, ethical–humanitarian agendas, and educational policy. This study contributes to restoring Islam’s vital élan as both a transformation of consciousness and a spectrum of exemplarity, offering a framework for contextual scholarly responses to the paradigmatic crisis facing Muslims in the digital age.
INTEGRATING KHILAFAH AND DEMOCRACY THROUGH PROPHETIC SOCIAL SCIENCE: TOWARD AN ETHICAL FRAMEWORK OF ISLAMIC GOVERNANCE Novianta Budi Surana; Riko Wijaya; Ibnu Azka; Fathur Baldan Haramain
Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora Vol. 23 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/khazanah.v23i1.18168

Abstract

Khilafah and democracy are two opposing poles according to many researchers. This assessment is actually reductive, because reading the two terms from one side, namely both as systems and forms of government. Democracy, as a system of government, is highly context-dependent, manifesting in various forms such as liberal, direct, or participatory democracy in various societies. Defenders of the caliphate are mistaken in interpreting the word caliphate mentioned in the Qur'an. Meanwhile, the plaintiffs of the caliphate agree with the assumption of the defense group. As a result, the assumption that the caliphate is a system and form of government continues to roll until it covers the original meaning of the caliphate itself. This article will clear the term caliphate from the pile of political tendencies and then reveal its original meaning. For that, the author proposes two problem formulations. First, what is the true meaning of the caliphate ? Second, how to reconcile the caliphate in a political sense with democracy ? In order to dissect the two problem formulations, the author will adopt two analytical knives, namely the thematic interpretation method and Kuntowijoyo's Prophetic Social Science. Thematic interpretation will reveal the basic meaning of the caliphate, while Kuntowijoyo's prophetic social science will synthesize the caliphate and democracy. This research will produce two conclusions. First, the caliphate is not a system and form of state, but rather a divine character that embodies the will to imitate God and personal responsibility for that character. Second, the caliphate manifests itself as an idea and movement based on science, not just doctrine and belief.