Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Komunikasi JURNAL KOMUNIKASI DAN BISNIS
Gita Pratiwi
Universitas Padjadjaran
Arts Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Coalition of Violence Claims Against Journalists in Detik.Com and Floresa 2021-2025 Gita Pratiwi; Hanny Hafiar; Pandan Yudapramesti
Jurnal Komunikasi Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Komunikasi
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/jk.v18i1.37495

Abstract

Violence against journalists in Indonesia is a recurring democratic issue, but news coverage often frames it as isolated incidents rather than structural problems. Previous studies have focused on legal protection, victim experiences, or case classification without systematically mapping how actors and claims form discourse coalitions across different media arenas. Using Discourse Network Analysis (DNA), we coded 391 actor statements from Detik.com (mainstream national) and Floresa.co (local alternative media) for six claim types (individual misconduct, procedural response, systemic violence, institutional accountability, justice demands, and obstacles to journalistic work) based on framing and discourse coalition theory. Network visualization was performed using DNA software and Gephi. The Indonesian National Police (Polri) dominated Detik.com (91 statements) with an individual-perpetrator to systemic claim ratio of 4.9:1. Floresa.co showed stronger advocacy actor presence (AJI, KKJ, LBH Pers, AMSI) and a near-balanced ratio (9:7). Two main coalitions emerged: individual-perpetrator-procedural and systemic-structural. Mainstream media reproduces institutional-procedural storylines, while alternative media enables systemic-structural advocacy coalitions, but discourse institutionalization of systemic claims remains incomplete in national public spheres. Protecting journalists requires not only legal reform but also transforming news routines that systematically prioritize institutional narratives over advocacy perspectives.
Bibliometric Analysis of Press Freedom: Trends, Patterns, and Key Research Areas Gita Pratiwi; Hanny Hafiar; Pandan Yudhapramesti
Jurnal Komunikasi dan Bisnis Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): May - October 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46806/jkb.v14i1.2010

Abstract

Press freedom serves as a fundamental pillar within a democratic system, ensuring that journalists can perform their role as social watchdogs without the shadow of intimidation. Globally, however, the integrity of this profession faces systemic challenges ranging from physical aggression to repression by state actors and interest groups. This study employs bibliometric analysis to map the evolving landscape of press freedom, identifying key trends, influential actors, and emerging themes within global scholarly literature. A total of 602 peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus from 1989 to 2025 were analyzed using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer, revealing a robust annual growth rate of 13.02% with a peak of 82 publications in 2025. The co-word network analysis identifies "Press Freedom" as the most central theme (betweenness centrality = 770.46), bridging critical clusters such as Censorship and Democracy alongside emerging themes of Digital Authoritarianism, Online Harassment, and Disinformation. The study reveals a notable shift towards digital authoritarianism, highlighting how online harassment and disinformation are increasingly used to silence journalists, thereby obstructing their watchdog function and weakening democratic discourse. The findings underline the growing need for comprehensive protection policies that address both physical and digital threats to journalists, ensuring the continued functioning of a free press in a rapidly changing political environment.
Co-Authors Hanny Hafiar Pandan Yudapramesti Pandan Yudhapramesti