Muhamad Fadholi
Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparative Analysis of Secondary School Teachers’ Competency in Literacy and Numeracy: A Cross-National Evidence from Indonesia and Afghanistan Muh. Takdir; Winda Dewi Listyasari; Desi Rahmawati; Muhamad Fadholi; Jenar Maheswari; Aisyah Febriani; Hazrat Shah Kayen
Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Lembaga Sosial Rumah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62491/njpi.2026.v6i1-1

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to analyze and compare the competencies of secondary school teachers in teaching literacy and numeracy in Indonesia and Afghanistan.Methods – Employing a descriptive comparative quantitative approach, the study involved 200 teachers from both countries selected through a stratified random sampling technique. Data were collected using questionnaires, classroom observations, and semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using descriptive statistics to compare the mean competency scores. Findings – The findings revealed that teachers in Indonesia demonstrated higher competency scores in literacy (71.4) and numeracy (68.3) compared to teachers in Afghanistan, who scored 62.8 in literacy and 59.7 in numeracy. Indonesian teachers also reported greater participation in professional training, more frequent use of educational technology, and a stronger application of contextual approaches in their teaching practices. The study underscores the importance of continuous professional development, resource support, and context-based pedagogical approaches in enhancing teacher competencies. Research Implications – These findings contribute to the formulation of more responsive educational policies and open avenues for further research within broader geographical and socio-cultural contexts.
Pengembangan Model SIAP-GS Berbasis Google Sites untuk Kesiapan Dokumentasi Akreditasi Program Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Rizqi Nur Afifah; Desi Rahmawati; Muhamad Fadholi; Gelar Gelora Mestika; Annisa Putri Alamsyah; Nashita Sabira Sahla; Gustiandra Tri Saputra
Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Lembaga Sosial Rumah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62491/njpi.2026.v6i3-16

Abstract

Purpose – This study aimed to develop a Google Sites-based document management model tailored to the specific context of the Educational Management undergraduate program at the Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, to strengthen its documentation readiness for accreditation under the Indonesian teacher-education accreditation instrument (IAPSK 3.0). This study is limited to documentation readiness specifically the extent to which accreditation evidence is structured, current, and traceable rather than overall accreditation readiness.Methods – A Research and Development approach following the ADDIE model was applied, limited to its first three stages: Analysis, Design, and Development. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with five key informants, four weeks of observation, and document study, then analyzed qualitatively with technique and source triangulation. To provide initial (formative) validation of the prototype rather than an Implementation or Evaluation stage a limited socialization was conducted with fourteen lecturers and education staff using a nineteen-item Likert questionnaire across four dimensions. Findings – The analysis showed that the real problem was not the absence of digital storage but the absence of structure, naming standards, and governance. The resulting model, named SIAP-GS, maps its information architecture directly onto the nine criteria and sixty-five elements of IAPSK 3.0, applies a single-source-multiple-views principle, and deliberately keeps technical complexity low. The prototype obtained an overall mean of 4.59 out of 5 (very good), with the highest score on the benefit-and-usefulness dimension.Research Implications – The study covers only the first three ADDIE stages and a single study program; the implementation and evaluation stages, wider testing, and long-term impact on actual accreditation outcomes remain agendas for further research.