Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang Indonesian Court and Justice Review
Annisa Putri
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Education

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Dari Gotong Royong ke Swipe dan Scroll: Transformasi Nilai Sosial dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat Indonesia Annisa Putri; Eko Handoyo; Indriana Eko Armaidi
Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang Vol. 12 No. 02 (2026): Volume 12 Nomor 02, Juni 2026 Published
Publisher : STKIP Subang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36989/didaktik.v12i02.15636

Abstract

The way people interact and communicate has changed significantly in recent years. Activities that were once carried out through direct face-to-face interactions are now increasingly conducted through social media and various digital platforms. This shift has influenced the social values that have long been embedded in Indonesian society, including gotong royong (mutual cooperation), which is recognized as one of the nation's cultural identities. This study aims to analyze the transformation of social values in Indonesian society from the culture of mutual cooperation to digital culture, as well as to examine the challenges and opportunities for preserving social values in the digital era. The study employed a library research method by utilizing relevant national and international journal articles as the primary sources of data. Data were collected through documentation techniques and analyzed using content analysis. The findings indicate that digital technology has transformed patterns of social interaction from physical spaces to digital environments. Nevertheless, the value of mutual cooperation has not disappeared; instead, it has adapted into more contemporary forms, such as online fundraising, digital social campaigns, and virtual communities. On the other hand, the digital era has also introduced challenges, including increasing tendencies toward individualism and reduced face-to-face social interaction. Therefore, efforts to preserve social values are needed through character education, digital literacy, and the responsible use of technology while maintaining the principles of togetherness and social solidarity.
Corruption in Judicial Case Administration within the Supreme Court: An Analysis of the Ratio Decidendi in Decision No. 7143 K/Pid.Sus/2024 Annisa Putri
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): February, 2026
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/w6mnbv94

Abstract

Corruption involving judicial case administration poses a fundamental threat to judicial independence, institutional integrity, and public confidence in the rule of law. When corrupt conduct occurs within the judicial institution itself, criminal adjudication must address not only the individual responsibility of the accused but also the broader institutional implications of such misconduct. This study analyses Supreme Court Decision No. 7143 K/Pid.Sus/2024 concerning corruption associated with the handling of cases within the Supreme Court. The research aims to identify the principal legal considerations employed by the Supreme Court in establishing criminal liability and to examine how the decision constructs the relationship between abuse of institutional authority, unlawful benefit, and corruption. The study uses a normative juridical methodology based on statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials include the relevant judicial decision and Indonesian anti-corruption legislation, while secondary materials comprise academic literature concerning judicial ethics, corruption, and institutional accountability. The analysis focuses on the interpretation of the elements of corruption, the evidentiary assessment of interactions surrounding case administration, and the judicial construction of abuse of authority. This study argues that corruption within judicial administration requires a particularly rigorous standard of reasoning because the legitimacy of the adjudicative system depends upon impartiality and procedural integrity. The case demonstrates that criminal accountability and judicial ethics are closely interconnected. The research recommends strengthening institutional safeguards, transparency mechanisms, and judicial accountability to prevent transactional practices from undermining the integrity of judicial decision-making.
Co-Authors Eko Handoyo Indriana Eko Armaidi