Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

JURIDICAL REVIEW RESOLUTION OF TORT DISPUTES IN ARISAN ACTIVITIES Khoirala, Rossyita; mahanani, Anajeng Esri Edhi
JARES (Journal of Academic Research and Sciences) Vol 9 No 1 (2024): March 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/jares.v9i1.2731

Abstract

Gathering activities are often carried out by the surrounding community which are unknowingly recognized as a form of agreement. Such as the gathering activity in Margomulyo Village, Tuban Regency, where the practice of the gathering agreement is carried out verbally based on a mutual agreement which gives birth to rights and obligations to be fulfilled. Wanprestasi, namely when the rights and obligations are not fulfilled properly which results in losses for other parties. This research method, namely empirical law, is the law of reviewing or looking at itself from outside elements (law) based on social phenomena in the real world (empirical) that influence legal behavior both personally and institutionally in society and institutions. law. The approach used in this study is a qualitative approach. Legal materials in research are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study can be concluded that the arisan agreement is verbalhas the legal force to bind the parties who make it, so that if a default occurs it can be used as a basis for declaring someone to have committed a wanprestasi. Meanwhile, settlement of default disputes can be resolved either through litigation or non-litigation.
IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICE DISCRETION IN CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IN ANARCHIC DEMONSTRATIONS Siregar, Salwa Ramadhani; mahanani, Anajeng Esri Edhi
JARES (Journal of Academic Research and Sciences) Vol 9 No 1 (2024): March 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/jares.v9i1.2910

Abstract

Police discretion is the authority of members of the police to take a policy in certain situations that require their own judgment as long as it does not violate statutory provisions. It aims to guard, maintain order and ensure public security. However, policies issued often raise pros and cons, especially when enforcing criminal law in securing demonstrations. The community considers that the actions taken are a form of hindering the achievement of their aspirations. This condition eventually led to riots during demonstrations which could threaten the safety of the demonstrators, police officers, as well as those at the location of the action. So that in this situation police discretion can be issued to prevent and deal with various threats that occur. This study uses an empirical juridical method, namely direct research conducted by studying the applicable legal rules with real events that occur in society. The results of this study explain related considerations, procedures, to obstacles and efforts made in the application of discretion by members of the police in overcoming anarchic demonstrations
THE ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT AND TIK TOK IN PROVIDING LEGAL PROTECTION FOR CREATORS AGAINST COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT FOR RE-SHOWING CINEMATOGRAPHIC WORKS ON THE TIK TOK APPLICATION Agustin, sasmitha; Mahanani, Anajeng Esri Edhi
JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research) Vol 9 No 1 (2024): March
Publisher : Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/josar.v9i1.3554

Abstract

Based on the Copyright Law, cinematographic works are defined as creations in the form of moving images, including documentary films, advertising films, reportages or story films made with scenarios, and cartoon films. In this modern era, the entertainment industry is also experiencing modernization in its broadcast media. Now you can easily find legal applications for enjoying cinematographic works on smartphones. Apart from using this convenience in a positive way, it turns out that there is still a gap for someone to commit a crime from the existing convenience, such as copyright infringement on cinematographic works. If this violation has occurred, what about legal protection for the creator of his work? The research used in this research is normative legal research or doctrinal law. Normative legal research is a type of legal research whose process is based on the logic of legal science from its normative side. In this research, researchers took a legislative approach by analyzing the relationship between one legal regulation and other regulations related to the problems that occurred. The results of this research explain the forms of copyright infringement against re-displays of cinematographic works on the Tik Tok application and the role of the government and Tik Tok in providing legal protection for creators against copyright violations for re-displays of cinematographic works on the Tik Tok application.
Reaktualisasi Politik Hukum Pancasila dalam Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional Mahanani, Anajeng Esri Edhi; Maharani, Andina Elok Puri
Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Staatsrecht Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/staatsrecht.v1i1.2426

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis reaktualisasi politik hukum Pancasila dalam upaya pembangunan sistem hukum nasional. Hasil pembahasan menyimpulkan bahwa pembangunan sistem hukum nasional yang diharapkan tentunya mengarah pada pembangunan hukum yang peka terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat, nilai-nilai asli Indonesia serta sanggup mengganti maupun menghapus hukum kolonial yang sampai dengan saat ini masih berlaku.
Impresi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Bersifat Positive Legislature Ditinjau dari Progresivitas Hukum dan Teori Pemisahan Kekuasaan Mahanani, Anajeng Esri Edhi
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 54 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v54i2.920

Abstract

Abstract: The Constitutional Court is one of the institutions with the judicial review power based on the constitution. In its authority to examine based on the constitution, the Constitutional Court not only has the authority to cancel norms (negative legislature), but also has the authority to form new norms (positive legislatures) against laws that either partially or wholly have been declared null and void. The nature of this decision raises the pros and cons, which is further examined in this article through the literature review method. This case literature review is based on the theoretical basis of legal progressivity and the theory of separation of powers based on the principle of checks and balances. Based on the results of an analytical study, it is known that the nature of decisions of positive legislature is resulted from the need for progressive judges in making legal findings to ensure the progressiveness of the law. In this regard, it is studied that making decisions that are positive in the legislature does not injure the meaning of separation of powers in modern constitutional practice, because this authority is exercised to ensure that the realization of checks and balances is in line with the rule of law of the democratic country.Abstrak: Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan salah satu pelaksana kekuasaan kehakiman yang berdiri pada kekuasaan yudikatif. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam kewenangannya menguji Undang-undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar, tidak hanya memiliki kewenangan untuk membatalkan norma (negative legislature), namun juga berwenang untuk membentuk norma baru (positive legislature) terhadap undang-undang yang baik sebagian maupun keseluruhan normanya, dinyatakan batal. Sifat putusan yang demikian telah menimbulkan pro dan kontra, dan hal itulah yang dikaji dalam artikel ini. Kajian literatur atas kasus ini didasarkan pada landasan teori progresivitas hukum serta teori pemisahan kekuasaan berdasarkan prinsip check and balances. Berdasarkan hasil kajian yang telah dilakukan, diketahui bahwa sifat putusan positive legislature merupakan wujud dari dibutuhkannya progresivitas hakim dalam melakukan penemuan hukum guna menjamin progresivitas hukum. Terkait hal ini, dapat dikatakan bahwa pengambilan putusan yang bersifat positive legislature tidak mencederai makna pemisahan kekuasaan pada praktik ketatanegaraan modern karena kewenangan ini dilaksanakan untuk menjamin terwujudnya check and balances yang bekerja pada negara hukum yang demokratis.
PERWUJUDAN KEMANFAATAN HUKUM DALAM PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP KORUPSI SEBAGAI KEJAHATAN LUAR BIASA Nugroho, Hafidz Amrullah Dzaky; Mahanani, Anajeng Esri Edhi
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 13 No 1 (2023): Februari 2023
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v13i1.2590

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hakim didalam Putusan Nomor 10/pid.sus-tpk/2021/PT.DKI. ditinjau dari teori kemanfaaatan hukum. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan tersebut belum sesuai dengan teori kemanfaatan hukum, mengingat penegakan hukumnya yang tidak tegas terhadap korupsi yang merupakan suatu kejahatan luar biasa (extra ordinary crime), terlebih terdakwanya merupakan aparat penegak hukum yang seharusnya dapat dihukum lebih berat. Seharusnya diutamakannya upaya pemberantasan masalah korupsi di Indonesia, mengingat dampak korupsi sangat menyeluruh dalam kehidupan masyaraakat bernegara.