Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Transformasi Global

INTERPRETASI DAN MIS INTERPRETASI BANTUAN LUAR NEGERI “STUDI KASUS: IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM POLICY ADVICE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE (PAKLIM) III DI KOTA MALANG” Sugianto, Dedy; Khurun'in, Irza; Najwah, Lia Nihlah
Jurnal Transformasi Global Vol. 6 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Transformasi Global (JTG)
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Brawijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/jtg.v6i1.111

Abstract

Implementation is a fairly important process in carrying out a decision. The implementation process will only start when the goals and objectives have been set, the activity program has been arranged and funds are ready and channeled to achieve the goals. Effective implementation is a must because, without effective implementation, decisions taken later will not be successfully implemented. If a policy/program does not function as it should, in the sense that the program cannot reduce existing problems, it can be said that the policy/program fails, but even a good policy/program can fail if implemented in an inappropriate manner. One thing that has become a problem in Malang regarding the implementation of PAKLIM foreign aid is that its implementation is not optimal. "Misinterpretation" is the biggest obstacle in the implementation of foreign aid which focuses on global environmental problems such as Climate Change. Many regional organizations have different views about the foreign aid program that is being implemented. This is inseparable from the still biased concepts that are brought about mainly on climate change assistance. In addition, developed and developing countries have different homework, if developed countries have jobs related to global problems such as ozone depletion and climate change issues, then developing countries, in this case, are more focused on domestic problems such as floods, inflation, poverty, and hunger and other problems whose effects are more felt by developing countries, thus making these global issues less important
Amnesty International dan Penghapusan Hukuman Mati di Malaysia Sianturi, Yanti Kristina; Khurun'in, Irza
Jurnal Transformasi Global Vol. 7 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Transformasi Global (JTG)
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Brawijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/jtg.v7i2.240

Abstract

Malaysia is a country where the death penalty is still present and frequently practiced. It is due to different understandings of the death penalty itself. The absence of the Malaysian government in various international human rights treaties also increases unfair trials on death row inmates. The high number of death row inmates in Malaysia represents a severe human rights violation. The abolition of the death penalty is one of the current global human rights agendas. It goes against the right to live regulated by various international human rights instruments, such as the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) and the Declaration of Human Rights. One of the INGOs actively advocating the abolition of the death penalty in Malaysia is Amnesty International. This study looks at Amnesty International’s transnational advocacy tactics in encouraging the death penalty abolition in Malaysia from 2015 to 2018. The method used is descriptive research by collecting primary and secondary data and using transnational advocacy networks by Keck and Sikkink. The results of this research show that the efforts used by Amnesty International in this advocacy include information politics, symbolic politics, leverage politics, and accountability politics.