Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Wan Rahmat Agustian
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Natuna, Komplek Masjid Agung Natuna
Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
THE UTILIZATION OF PLEDGED GOODS IN ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLASSICAL SCHOLARLY PERSPECTIVES AND IMAM SHAFI'I'S LEGAL FRAMEWORK: Rahn, Utilization of Pledged Goods, Imam Shafi'i Wan Rahmat Agustian; Kartubi; Januariusdi
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 15 No 2 (2026): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i2.8025

Abstract

The utilization of pledged goods (rahn) in informal Muslim community transactions in Indonesia remains widely practiced yet legally unexamined, creating a normative gap between community convention and classical Islamic jurisprudence. This study aims to analyze Imam Shafi'i's precise legal reasoning on the utilization of pledged goods and to comparatively situate his position against the Hanafi, Maliki, and Hanbali schools. Employing a qualitative approach with a case study design, data were collected through library research on classical fiqh texts and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman & Saldaña. The study finds that Imam Shafi'i categorically prohibits any creditor utilization of pledged goods, classifying it as riba regardless of mutual consent, asset type, or pledge duration, grounded in the principle that ownership and its benefits remain exclusively with the pledgor. Comparatively, the Hanafi school permits utilization upon explicit consent, the Maliki school allows limited animal use proportionate to maintenance, and the Hanbali school grounds animal-use permissibility in prophetic authority. These divergences reflect fundamental differences in jurisprudential methodology across the four schools. The findings provide doctrinal clarity essential for protecting economically vulnerable communities from exploitative informal financial arrangements, directly contributing to SDG 1, SDG 10, and SDG 16.
Co-Authors Januariusdi Kartubi