Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Rahma Handaya
Universitas Mulawarman Samarinda
Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
EVALUATION OF GENERAL BUREAUCRATIC REFORM POLICIES WITHIN THE KUTAI KARTANEGARA REGENCY GOVERNMENT Rahma Handaya; Kus Indarto; Cathas Teguh Prakoso
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 15 No 3 (2026): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v15i3.8930

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of General Bureaucratic Reform in the Kutai Kartanegara Regency Government using William N. Dunn’s evaluation framework. Bureaucratic reform is a national strategic agenda within the 2010–2025 Grand Design to build a clean, accountable, capable and service-oriented bureaucracy. Data were collected through interviews, observations and a review of official documents from the Ministry of State Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reform (KemenPANRB), and were subsequently analysed using a descriptive qualitative approach based on Dunn’s six evaluation criteria: effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, fairness, responsiveness and accuracy. The main novelty of this evaluation of the General Bureaucratic Reform (RB) policy in the Kutai Kartanegara Regency Government (Kukar Regency Government) lies in the shift in focus from upstream administrative assessment towards agile, high-integrity performance-based governance (SAKIP) to support the ‘Golden Indonesia 2045’ vision. The research findings indicate positive achievements in the simplification of organisational structure (score of 100.45 per cent), yet weaknesses remain, such as in the development of the Integrity Zone (0.5), SPI (67.14 per cent) and SAKIP (65.93 per cent). Effectiveness remains partial, efficiency is low due to weak digital integration, adequacy and equity are insufficient, bureaucratic responsiveness is limited, and the relevance of policies does not yet fully align with local needs. This study offers practical contributions in the form of strategic recommendations for improvement, whilst also expanding the application of the Dunn framework at the regional level.
Co-Authors Cathas Teguh Prakoso Kus Indarto