Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

KEABSAHAN TINDAKAN NOTARIS MENAHAN SERTIPIKAT MILIK KLIEN DALAM HAL TERJADI KURANG BAYAR KOMISI JASA PENGURUSAN SERTIPIKAT Muhammad Azmi Khoirurrijal; Djumikasih Djumikasih; Herlindah Herlindah
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 6, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (312.444 KB) | DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v6i1.14064

Abstract

 Jurnal ini ditulis dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis keabsahan tindakan Notaris menahan suatu sertipikat milik Penghadap dalam hal terjadi kekurangan pembayaran Komisi Jasa Pengurusan Sertipikat milik Penghadap. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian Yuridis Normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, dan juga pendekatan konseptual yang dalam penyelesaiaannya dideskripsikan, serta dianalisis menggunakan teori Keabsahan Hukum. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa perbuatan Notaris yang memberikan jasa pengurusan sertipikat tersebut seperti perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh seorang Komisioner (Pasal 76 KUHDagang) yang bertindak atas permintaan orang lain dan mendapatkan komisi/provisi. Namun dalam hal ini karena ia bertindak atas nama Pemberi Kuasa, sesuai ketentuan Pasal 79 KUHDagang maka ia tunduk pada ketentuan Pemberian Kuasa yakni pada Bab XVI KUHPerdata. Seorang Notaris berhak menahan sertipikat milik kliennya dalam terjadi kekurangan pembayaran komisi jasa pengurusan sertipikat, dengan didasarkan pengaturan pada Pasal 1729 dan Pasal 1812 KUHPerdata. Berdasarkan kedua pasal tersebut orang yang menerima titipan/kuasa pekerjaan dapat menahan kepunyaan milik pemberi titipan/kuasa apabila biaya jasa dan juga biaya-biaya yang timbul selama penitipan dan kuasa tersebut harus dibayar lunas oleh Pemberi titipan/kuasa, sehingga sah apabila Notaris menahan sertipikat milik penghadapnya dalam hal terjadi kurang bayar Komisi Jasa Pengurusannya.Kata-Kunci: Hak Retensi, Notaris, Jasa Pengurusan, KomisiThe journal was written with the aim of finding out and analyzing the legality of Notary’s action in withholding a certificate belonging to an Appearer on a shortage of payment Certificate Management Service Commission belonging to the Appearer. The research was a normative juridical research using laws and regulations approach, as well as a conceptual approach in which the solution was described and analyzed using Legal Validity theory. The result of the research was the act of a notary who provided certificate management service was like an act of commissioner (Article 76 of Commercial Code) who acted at the other request and got a commission/provision. However, he acted on behalf of the authorizer in accordance with Article 79 of Commercial Code, so he obeyed to the terms of Power of Attorney, namely in Chapter XVI of Civil Code. Based on the two articles, the person who received the power may retain the property of the authorizer if the service fee and other costs during the safekeeping and the power must be paid in full by the authorizer. It is legal if the notary retains the deed of the Appearer in the event of a shortage of payment Management Service Commission. Keywords: Retention Rights, Notary, Management Service, Commission.
CHARACTER-BUILDING FOR LAW STUDENTS: EXPLORING THE SATJIPTO RAHARDJO’S THOUGHTS Herlindah Herlindah; Siti Rohmah; Ahmad Qiram As-Suvi
Waskita: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter Vol 6, No 2 (2022): WASKITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter
Publisher : PUSAT MPK UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.waskita.2022.006.02.3

Abstract

The quality of law enforcement is determined by the character-building in the Faculty of Law. If so far, Indonesia is often faced with various poor quality law enforcement, and this portrait certainly does not occur naturally, but rather because the law faculty has not been able to play its role optimally in building the character of prospective law enforcers. This study explores Satjipto Rahardjo's thoughts on character-building for law enforcers at the faculty of law. The research method used in this article is a literature study with a qualitative descriptive approach using content analysis. The result of this study indicates that according to Satjipto Rahardjo, legal education at the Faculty of Law must be reoriented from the formation of a positivistic character to the formation of a progressive character of law that prioritizes ethical and moral values
Government Role in Agricultural Management as Agrarian Resource Herlindah
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 1 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v1i1.83

Abstract

Agriculture is a one of land resources called agrarian which brings strategic functions and roles for Indonesia as agrarian country. It is identified as being strategic due to a great number of Indonesian people who rely their lives on agricultural sector. Thus, farms do not only have economic value but also social value, and even religious one. Besides, farms are also subjected for agricultural investment activities involving hugecapital companies through which a large-scale extensification of farms will increase over time. This paper focused on the state control over agrarian resources. Starting from farms as agrarian resources, the governance rights of land by a country is based on both UUPA and the exegesis of Constitutional Court. Findings showed that there were 4 (four) models of The state control over agrarian resources based on Article 2 UUPA. However, as Constitutional Court verdict Number 002/PUU-I/2003 testing toward the Law Number 22, 2001 on oil and gas toward the Constitution 1945 was established, the state control over farms could be broadly defined as public rights for all people of Indonesia over its agrarian resources.
THE EXISTENCE OF PANCASILA IN RESOLVING CONFLICTS OF DIFFERING VIEWS ON RELIGIOUS RIGHTS IN INDONESIA Herlindah Herlindah; Indah Dwi Qurbani; Dorra Prisilia
Diponegoro Law Review Vol 7, No 2 (2022): Diponegoro Law Review October 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dilrev.7.2.2022.212-229

Abstract

This research investigates how Pancasila (the Five Principles) could serve as an equilibrium in regulating the freedom of religion in Indonesia and how these five principles could negotiate the concept of this freedom within the coverage of national Human Rights affected by western human rights related to the concept of the freedom of religions within the scope of Islam. The three different regulatory concepts regarding freedom of religion in Indonesia, constituting Islamic law, International Human Rights, and Particular Human Rights, have always sparked conflict unless these three concepts are accommodated by law.  The analysis was performed by employing the doctrine of margin of appreciation. This research reveals that Pancasila could serve as the fundamental of Indonesia in facilitating the freedom of religion. This research also employed a normative-juridical method, interdisciplinary, statutory, and conceptual approaches.
Suing the Oligarchy of Ownership and Control of Agricultural Land in Indonesia: A Maqashid Sharia Review of the Land of Agrarian Reform Objects (TORA) Exceeding the Maximum Boundary Herlindah Herlindah; Moh Anas Kholish; Andi Muhammad Galib
Media Syari'ah : Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Vol 24, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Sharia and Law Faculty

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jms.v24i2.12960

Abstract

This article aims to identify and analyze Land Objects of Agrarian Reform (TORA) on agricultural land that exceeds the maximum limit in positive law in Indonesia, as well as analyze maqashid sharia and the future of TORA as a legal standing for lawsuits against the oligarchs of control and ownership of agricultural land in Indonesia. This article is a normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this study indicate that in positive law in Indonesia there are six characteristics of TORA Agricultural land exceeding the maximum limit, namely: (1) The subject of the original owner's rights is an individual with the size of one family; (2) agricultural land is divided into two types, namely paddy fields and dry land; (3) non-HGU land tenure, temporary and limited rights obtained from the government and legal entities; (4) there is a violation of the maximum land area; (5) TORA exceeds the maximum limit of transfer to the state based on forced expropriation; (6) TORA in excess of the maximum limit is given to the subject of land recipient rights based on a government stipulation. In addition, the results of this study also show that the rules regarding land as objects of agrarian reform as stipulated in positive law in Indonesia are very compatible with the spirit of maqashid sharia, namely hifz al-mal. In the perspective of contemporary maqashid sharia, hifz al-mal is not only interpreted as a prevention of monopoly and exploitation of wealth by oligarchic elites, but also must be developed philosophically regarding the distribution of resources for society. If linked in this article, hifz al-mal which is one of the pillars of maqashid sharia must also be developed in the context of making positive rules regarding the distribution of ownership and control of land in a fair and equitable manner. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis Tanah Objek Reforma Agraria (TORA) pada tanah pertanian kelebihan batas maksimum dalam hukum positif di Indonesia, serta menganalisis maqashid syariah dan masa depan TORA sebagai legal standing atas gugatan terhadap oligarki penguasaan dan kepemilikan tanah pertanian di Indonesia. Artikel ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Adapun hasil dari studi ini menunjukkan bahwa dalam hukum positif di Indonesia terdapat enam karakteristik TORA Tanah pertanian kelebihan batas maksimum yaitu: (1) Subjek hak pemilik asal adalah orang perorangan dengan ukuran satu keluarga; (2) tanah pertanian dibedakan menjadi dua jenis yaitu tanah sawah dan dan tanah kering; (3) penguasaan tanah bukan HGU, hak-hak sementara dan terbatas yang didapat dari pemerintah dan badan-badan hukum; (4) terjadi pelanggaran luas batas maksimum tanah; (5) TORA kelebihan batas maksimum beralih kepada negara berdasarkan pengambilalihan secara paksa; (6) TORA kelebihan batas maksimum diberikan kepada subjek hak penerima tanah berdasarkan penetapan pemerintah. Selain itu, hasil studi ini juga menunjukkan bahwa aturan-aturan tentang tanah objek reforma agraria sebagaimana ketentuan dalam hukum positif di Indonesia sangat kompatibel dengan spirit maqashid syariah yaitu hifz al-mal. Dalam perspektif maqashid syariah kontemporer, hifz al-mal bukan hanya dimaknai sebagai pencegahan atas monopoli dan eksploitasi harta dari para elit oligarki, namun juga harus dikembangkan secara filosofis tentang distribusi sumber daya bagi masyarakat. Jika dikaitkan dalam artikel ini, maka hifz al-mal yang menjadi salah satu pilar maqashid syariah juga harus dikembangkan dalam konteks pembuatan aturan secara positif tentang distribusi kepemilikan dan penguasaan tanah secara adil dan merata.
Development Legal Theory and Progressive Legal Theory: A Review, In Indonesia’s Contemporary Legal Reform Herlindah; Yadi Darmawan
Peradaban Journal of Law and Society Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Pustaka Peradaban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (489.798 KB)

Abstract

The development legal theory and progressive legal theory are legal theories that are widely known in Indonesia. Both of them have inspired many legal experts and legal actors in Indonesia. The slow pace of legal reform in Indonesia, especially in eradicating corruption, is a big challenge that this nation must face. Therefore, the contribution of various parties is needed to answer the challenge. This article attempts to review the development legal theory and progressive legal theory in the context of legal reform in Indonesia. The study finds that both theories are very relevant to the current development of law in Indonesia. From the perspective of development legal theory, legal reform must be carried out by formulating laws that can encourage community transformation. On the other hand, the progressive legal theory emphasizes reforms in legal institutions and individual law enforcers. The law must be carried out by actors who have integrity and dare to take methods of a legal settlement that are out of the ordinary while remaining oriented and committed to the values ​​of justice and humanity.
THE DECONSTRUCTION OF NAHDLATUL ULAMA ACTIVISTS AGAINST THE CONCEPT OF AGRARIAN REFORM BASED ON FIQH OF PRIORITIES Herlindah Herlindah; Siti Rohmah; In'amul Mushoffa; Abdul Kodir
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 14, No 1 (2023): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v14i1.21037

Abstract

After several years of suspension, agrarian reform was re-implemented as a way to achieve agrarian justice. This policy was stipulated in the Presidential Regulation Number 86 of 2018 concerning the Implementation of Agrarian Reform which is framed in the Agrarian Reform and Social Forestry (RAPS). However, many groups, mainly the Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) with their strong activism in the agrarian struggle, deeply criticized this policy. This research will examine how NU activists deconstruct the concept of agrarian reform in the RAPS policy using the priority fiqh theory. Fiqh of priorities was initiated to consider the implementation of charity acts or policies deserving the priority of concern based on Shariah principles. This study applied empirical and normative legal research by interviewing NU activists, who paid a specific concern in the agrarian sector, and by conducting a literature review of the results of NU’s ijtihad regarding agrarian reform. The result of this study indicates that agrarian reform in the RAPS policy has not fulfilled the priority fiqh principles. This article contributes to the accuracy of the concept and implementation of agrarian reform in Indonesia which is more just in accordance with the scale of priorities needed to achieve the goals of agrarian reform.Setelah bertahun-tahun ditangguhkan, reforma agraria kembali diterapkan sebagai salah satu cara untuk mewujudkan keadilan di bidang agraria. Kebijakan ini ditetapkan dalam Peraturan Presiden Nomor 86 Tahun 2018 tentang Pelaksanaan Reforma Agraria yang dibingkai dalam kebijakan Reforma Agraria dan Pergutanan Sosial (RAPS). Tetapi, kebijakan reforma agraria dalam RAPS dikritik banyak kalangan, salah satunya dari kalangan Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) yang aktif dalam perjuangan agraria. Penelitian ini akan mengkaji bagaimana dekonstruksi aktivis NU terhadap konsep reforma agraria dalam kebijakan RAPS dengan menggunakan teori fikih prioritas. Fikih prioritas merupakan salah satu teori dalam fikih kontemporer yang digagas untuk mempertimbangkan pelaksanaan amal atau kebijakan yang perlu diprioritaskan berdasarkan kaidah-kaidah syari’at. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian hukum empiris dan normatif, dengan mewawancarai para aktivis NU concern di bidang agraria serta kajian literatur terhadap hasil ijtihad NU mengenai reforma agraria. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa reforma agraria dalam kebijakan RAPS belum memenuhi kaidah fikih prioritas. Artikel ini berkontribusi untuk mengakurasi konsep dan implementasi reforma agraria di Indonesia yang lebih adil sesuai dengan skala prioritas yang dibutuhkan untuk menggapai tujuan reforma agraria.
Provision Of A Mandatory Will For Adopted Children Who Are Not Adopted Through Court Determination Based On The Maqashid Syariah Perspective: (Case Study of Palembang High Religious Court Decision Number. 35/Pdt.G/2018/PTA.Plg) Febry Larasati; Nur Chanifah; Herlindah Herlindah
Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 03 (2024): August Asian Journal of Management Entrepreneurship and Social Science ( AJMES
Publisher : Cita Konsultindo Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Marriage itself has a goal, namely to form a happy family, and hopes that children will be the pride of the family so that they can continue their offspring. However, it can be seen that there are still many marriages that do not produce offspring. So many of these husband and wife couples adopt children. To anticipate conflicts or disputes in the future, child registration should also be done through a court order, this is to ensure legal certainty. As an example of the case in decision No. 35/Pdt.G/2018/PTA.Plg. The case in this decision is that there was an adopted child named Kiki Wahyuni who was not adopted through a court decision, but only adopted through custom. This of course gave rise to conflict. When both of her adoptive parents died, the research results showed that even though Kiki Wahyuni was not adopted through a court decision, However, the judge brought witnesses to state that it was true that Kiki Wahyuni had been cared for since she was a 1 (one) year old baby, namely around 1989 to 1999. Based on the Compilation of Islamic Law, Kiki Wahyuni should not have received assets from her late adoptive parents through a mandatory will. However, because there is a conflict between Article 171 letter h of the Compilation of Islamic Law and the court's decision, then through the principle of Res Judicata Pro Viratate Habetur, the judge's decision is considered correct and can be implemented
Analisis Yuridis Pembatasan Pemberian Hak Milik Atas Tanah Untuk Rumah Tinggal: Juridical Analysis of Limiting Land Size for Residential Housing Fitriana, Dina; Herlindah; Wicaksono, Setiawan
WARKAT Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Desember
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/warkat.v3n2.1

Abstract

The restriction of the land size for residential housing is intended to prevent any piling up lands for certain people as in line with Articles 7 and 17 of Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) which are further highlighted in Government Regulation according to Article 12 of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 56 of 1960. However, there are no regulations governing the limitation of land size in place. More specific regulations regarding the right to land are outlined in the Decree of Agrarian Minister/the Head of National Land Agency Number 6 of 1998 concerning Grant of Right to Land for Residential Housing. The regulatory provisions highlight the restriction of the land size requested for residential housing and the land size that applicants can own, but it is only restricted to the applicants or for extended rights. The Decree of Agrarian Minister/the Head of National Land Agency Number 6 1998 does not seem to give a solution to what has been mandated in ownership or right restriction of non-agricultural lands, which is to be regulated in Government Regulation. Departing from the issue above, this research aims to study the grant of the right to land for residential housing by conducting a juridical analysis. This research use normative methods to analyze land ownership limitation and land registration.
Integration of Customary Law in Agrarian Law Development in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era: Significance and Urgency Erdika, Lucy; Brahmana, Sindy Sri Widyawati Sembiring; Herlindah; Permadi, Iwan
Peradaban Journal of Law and Society Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Pustaka Peradaban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59001/pjls.v3i1.131

Abstract

The Industrial Revolution 4.0 era recently offers automation systems across various aspects of life. This situation challenges Indonesia's land law rooted in customary law. This article aims to explore the role and relevance of customary law as the foundation of national agrarian law in the face of rapid Industry 4.0 growth. The findings indicate that customary law, as the cornerstone of the Basic Agrarian Law, is crucial not only as a source of norms and supplementary norms in national land law. Recognition of customary law remains pivotal to ensure the sustainability of indigenous communities, protect traditional land rights, and promote inclusive agrarian justice. The integration of customary law within Indonesia's national legal framework reflects a commitment to advancing agrarian justice and supporting the principles of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. Thus, customary law continues to be relevant as a foundation and principle for legislative formation, including agrarian law. A legal pluralism system recognizing customary law as an integral part of agrarian law holds significant potential in supporting comprehensive and inclusive agrarian justice in Indonesia, aligning with agrarian law policies aimed at safeguarding pluralistic rights of indigenous communities. Revolusi Industri 4.0 baru-baru ini menawarkan sistem otomatisasi dalam berbagai bidang kehidupan. Situasi ini menantang hukum tanah Indonesia yang berasal dari hukum adat. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran dan relevansi hukum adat sebagai dasar dari hukum agraria nasional dalam menghadapi pertumbuhan pesat Revolusi Industri 4.0. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa hukum adat sebagai fondasi dari Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria tidak hanya penting sebagai sumber norma dan norma pelengkap dalam hukum tanah nasional. Pengakuan terhadap hukum adat tetap krusial untuk memastikan keberlanjutan komunitas adat, perlindungan hak-hak tanah tradisional, serta promosi keadilan agraria yang inklusif. Integrasi hukum adat dalam kerangka hukum nasional Indonesia mencerminkan komitmen untuk memajukan keadilan agraria dan mendukung prinsip Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Dengan demikian hukum adat masih dan akan terus relevan sebagai dasar dan prinsip untuk pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan, termasuk hukum agraria. Sistem pluralisme hukum yang mengakui hukum adat sebagai bagian integral dari sistem hukum agraria menjadi potensi besar dalam mendukung keadilan agraria yang menyeluruh dan inklusif di Indonesia, sejalan dengan arah kebijakan hukum agraria yang bertujuan melindungi hak-hak pluralis masyarakat adat.
Co-Authors Abd Shomad Abdul Kodir Agung Ali Fahmi Ahmad Qiram As-Suvi Alarico M Tilman Andhika Arya Tamtama Andi Muhammad Galib Ari Yuliani, Anggi Arif Zainudin Arini Jauharoh Arya Sandi Yudha Libert Brahmana, Sindy Sri Widyawati Sembiring Crisdianto, Labib Renedy Damayanti Asikin Damayanti Asikin Dhiana Puspitawati Dhianya Azzahra Jasmine Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani Djumikasih Djumikasih Djumikasih Dorra Prisilia Dwi Handayani Dyah Aju Wisnuwardhani Ema Yunita Titisari Erdika, Lucy Fajar Tri Setiadi Fauza Shofia Fauzan Febry Larasati Fitriana, Dina Fransiskus Arya Kusuma Aji Hamidi Masykur, Mohammad Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Heptari Elita Dewi Herman Suryokumoro Heru Ratno Hadi I Nyoman Nurajaya In'amul Mushoffa Indah Dwi Qurbani Indah Dwi Qurbani Irfan Hafiyyansah Iwan Permadi Jonathan Pascal Chrisananto Julaihi Wahid Keri Pranata Konradus Lalo M. Hamidi Masykur M. Sudirman Maulana Ibrahim Patahna Md Yazid Ahmad Moh Anas Kholish Mohammad Hamidi Maskur Muhammad Azmi Khoirurrijal Muhammad Ferdynan Alfareza Muntaz, Nabila Aleysafa Nolanda Fadiahaya Trigosa Nur Chanifah Nur Laili Safitri Putri, Ananda Salasa Rachel Olivia Pasaribu Rachmad Safa’at Rachmad Safa’at Rachmad Syafa'at Rani Nurin Anjes Shinesti Ranitya Ganindha Rita Devi Permatasari Rizky Amelia Fathia Septiandani, Dian Setiawan Wicaksono Setiawan Wicaksono, Setiawan Shang Dyah Pitaloka Siti Rohmah Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Syahrul Sajidin Syeh Aries Fauzan Tita Jiwanty Fitri Yadi Darmawan Yasniar Rachmawati Madjid Yenny Eta Widyanti Yenny Eta Widyanti Zahro Zainna Sahida