Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains
Arini Jauharoh
Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia
Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Interpretation of Honorariums and Free Services by PPAT in Land Registration Riki Eri Setyo; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Arini Jauharoh
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2025): International Journal on Language, Research (Law) Education Studies
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.25056

Abstract

This study examines the normative interpretation of the terms “honorarium” and “services without charging fees” under Article 32 of PP No. 24/2016 and Permen ATR/BPN No. 33/2021. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research explores legal ambiguities in PPAT obligations, especially in digital land services outside the deed-making process. Findings reveal a regulatory vacuum that creates unequal treatment for PPATs and the poor, with unclear implementation boundaries and unjust workloads. The study proposes a normative interpretation model that aligns doctrine with practical conditions, emphasizing distributive and procedural justice. It recommends regulatory reform to classify service types, define reasonable honorariums, and ensure legal protection for all parties in digital land administration.
Physical And Sensory Disabilities: Legal Certainty And Justice In The Notary Profession Tiara Maharani; M. Hamidi Masykur; Arini Jauharoh
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.348

Abstract

This study examines the legal issues regarding the requirements for appointment as a Notary as regulated in Article 3 of the Notary Law (UUJN), with a focus on the regulation of physical and sensory disabilities. The background of this study is the incompleteness of norms in the UUJN which has the potential to cause legal uncertainty and discriminatory practices against persons with disabilities, both at the stage of appointing a Notary and against Notaries who experience life events that cause physical and/or sensory disabilities. The UUJN requires Notaries to be physically and mentally healthy, but does not provide explicit regulations regarding the limits and parameters of such health in relation to disabilities. This study aims to analyze the concept of physical and sensory disabilities in relation to the implementation of the Notary's authority and obligations and to formulate an ideal form of regulation to realize legal certainty and justice for all citizens. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The analysis is carried out systematically and grammatically against the UUJN, the Health Law, the Law on Persons with Disabilities, and the Human Rights Law, and is based on the theory of legal certainty and dignified justice. The research results indicate that the requirement for physical health must be interpreted functionally, focusing on a person's ability to perform the duties of a notary, rather than on absolute physical condition. An analysis of the notary's authority and obligations indicates that upper locomotor and sensory functions play an essential role, while lower locomotor functions are not decisive. Therefore, this study proposes amendments to Article 3 of the UUJN by adding norms that recognize the ability to perform the position with or without reasonable accommodation, including the use of assistive technology. Furthermore, it is necessary to regulate leave procedures, functional assessments, and evaluations for notaries who experience disabilities after being appointed.
Regulatory Framework for Social Mapping  in Structuring Access to Agrarian Reform Nur Laili Safitri; Herlindah; Arini Jauharoh
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 2 (2026): September in progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i2.377

Abstract

the structuring of agrarian reform access and to formulate an ideal regulatory framework to ensure legal certainty. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The analysis applies grammatical, systematic, and constructive interpretation of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through library research. The novelty of this study lies in its analysis of social mapping as a lex imperfecta under Article 58 paragraph (1) of Presidential Regulation Number 62 of 2023. This study also proposes a legal reconstruction that positions social mapping as a normative prerequisite for ensuring legal certainty in agrarian reform access structuring. The findings reveal that the incomplete regulation of social mapping creates multiple interpretations, weak verification mechanisms, and the absence of sanctions. These conditions result in inaccurate access structuring, low effectiveness in empowering agrarian reform subjects, and an increasing potential for agrarian conflicts. Based on the legal certainty theory of Gustav Radbruch, the regulation has not fulfilled the principle of legal certainty because it is not formulated clearly and operationally. This study recommends legal reconstruction by establishing social mapping as a mandatory procedure supported by standardized operational guidelines, participatory verification mechanisms, Key Performance Indicators (KPI), and clear sanction provisions in order to create a more effective, measurable, and equitable agrarian reform access system.
Co-Authors Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Herlindah M. Hamidi Masykur Nur Laili Safitri Riki Eri Setyo Tiara Maharani