Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Frequency of International Relations (FETRIAN)
Debora Fany Ilfi Nurdiana
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
HUBUNGAN KRISIS IKLIM DAN KONFLIK KOMUNAL : ANALISIS KEKERASAN DI SAHEL Mutiara Nursukma Wulandari; Debora Fany Ilfi Nurdiana; Marsya Ade Nabila; Zaky Ismail
Frequency of International Relations (FETRIAN) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Andalas Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/fetrian.7.1.153-171.2025

Abstract

The Sahel region of Africa has experienced an increase in communal conflict in the last two decades. This research aims to understand the extent to which the climate crisis has contributed to the emergence of violence in the region. Changes in rainfall patterns, prolonged droughts and land degradation have exacerbated struggles over resources such as water and pasture between farming and pastoralist groups. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach through content analysis. Data sources were obtained from reports of international organizations (such as the UN, FAO, and ICRC), scientific journal articles, and global conflict databases. The data were analyzed to identify patterns of relationships between climate change phenomena and communal conflict dynamics. The results of the analysis show that the climate crisis is not a single cause, but a trigger factor that exacerbates pre-existing socio-economic tensions, such as marginalization of ethnic groups, weak local governance, and unequal access to resources. In other words, the climate crisis acts as a “threat multiplier” that increases the risk of conflict in an already vulnerable region. The research recommends a holistic approach to conflict management in the Sahel, combining climate adaptation policies, inclusive development and strengthening local institutions.
Analisis Perbandingan Australia dan Amerika Serikat dalam Merespon Isu Radikalisme Anisyatur Rohmah Rohmah; Muhammad Ilham; Debora Fany Ilfi Nurdiana; Raida
Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jhi.v19i1.86028

Abstract

Isu radikalisme telah mendorong berbagai negara untuk menyusun kebijakan untuk menjaga keamanan nasional, seperti Australia dan Amerika Serikay yang sama-sama dua negara dengan nilai demokratis dan landasan sekularisme, hal ini justru menunjukkan respons yang berbeda dalam merespons radikalisme yang terjadi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif-deksriptif dengan pendekatan komparatif, maka dari itu penggunaan teori sistem politik David Easton menjadi sebuah kerangka analisis untuk melihar dinamika input politik, proses konversi, hingga output yang dihasilkan. Analisis ini menunjukkan bahwa Amerika Serikat merespon ancaman radikalisme memfokuskan pada keamanan nasional dengan pendekatan represif dan peruasan otoritas aparat, sedangkan Australia memadukan penegakan hukum dengan upaya pencegahan sosial berbasis komunitas. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa respons negara terhadap radikalisme tidak hanya dipengaruhi oleh ancamannya, namun pada bagaimana sistem politik memproses tuntutan publik dan nilai-nilai yang hidup di masyarakat. Kata Kunci: Radikalisme; kebijakan kontra-terorisme; teori sistem politik; Amerika Serikat; Australia.
Co-Authors Anisyatur Rohmah Rohmah Marsya Ade Nabila Muhammad Ilham Mutiara Nursukma Wulandari Raida Zaky Ismail