Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Punggawa Law Review
Dykasakti Azhar Nytotama
Universitas Galuh

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal and Democratic Uncertainty in the Mechanism of Electing DPRD Leadership Based on Party Seat Acquisition: A Study on the Principle of Majority Vote and Fairness of Constituent Representation Dykasakti Azhar Nytotama; Aan Afandi
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67707/v00wsz21

Abstract

Law Number 17 of 2014 on the MPR, DPR, DPD, and DPRD (Law on MD3), particularly Articles 327 and 376, stipulated that the leadership of provincial and regency/municipal Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) was drawn from the political party with the highest number of seats, rather than from the individual legislative candidate who obtained the highest number of votes. This provision stood in contrast to the principle governing the determination of elected DPRD members under Article 422 of Law Number 7 of 2017 on General Elections, which based individual electability on the highest number of votes obtained within an electoral district. This article examined this normative inconsistency and its implications for legal certainty and the quality of local democracy, focusing on two problems: first, the shift of DPRD leadership legitimacy from voters' will to the decisions of political party elites; second, the disparity in institutional support, including the recess-activity budget, between members who obtained the highest votes without holding leadership positions and those who held leadership positions through the party-seat mechanism, even though both bore an equally significant burden of constituent representation. Employing normative legal research through statutory and conceptual approaches, the article concluded that norm harmonization and a reconfiguration of the criteria for electing DPRD leadership were needed to align the mechanism with the principle of voter sovereignty and the proportionality of constituent representation.
Rekonstruksi Sistem Penegakan Pidana Pemilu Dalam Perspektif Konstitusionalisme: Urgensi Pelembagaan Peradilan Pemilu Di Indonesia Dykasakti Azhar Nytotama; Ikhlas Ulul Albab Arridho
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 4 (2026): Punggawa Law Review: October
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67707/plr.v1i4.236

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji urgensi pembentukan peradilan ad hoc khusus pemilu sebagai upaya rekonstruksi sistem penegakan pidana pemilu di Indonesia. Pemilu merupakan instrumen utama pelaksanaan kedaulatan rakyat yang memiliki dimensi konstitusional, sehingga pelanggaran pemilu mengancam integritas demokrasi dan legitimasi pemerintahan. Penanganan tindak pidana pemilu saat ini masih berada dalam rezim peradilan umum dan melibatkan berbagai lembaga melalui Sentra Gakkumdu. Hal ini sering memunculkan fragmentasi kewenangan, perbedaan penafsiran hukum, serta tidak adaptif terhadap batas waktu tahapan pemilu yang singkat. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa karakteristik khusus tindak pidana pemilu menuntut standardisasi pembuktian yang spesifik dan berorientasi pada keadilan elektoral (electoral justice). Oleh karena itu, pembentukan peradilan ad hoc khusus pemilu yang diisi oleh hakim dengan kompetensi kepemiluan sangat diperlukan. Keberadaan peradilan khusus ini bertujuan untuk memotong rantai birokrasi penegakan hukum, menyatukan persepsi hukum, dan menjamin putusan yang cepat, berkepastian, serta adil demi menjaga kemurnian kedaulatan rakyat.
Co-Authors Aan Afandi Ikhlas Ulul Albab Arridho