Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Sustainability disclosure as a mediator: The effects of profitability, leverage, and institutional ownership on firm value in Indonesian Banking (2021–2024) Anggya Julliet Jennyver Mangundap; Jullie Jeannete Sondakh; Hendrik Gamaliel
The Contrarian : Finance, Accounting, and Business Research Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Widyantara Nawasena Raharja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58784/cfabr.452

Abstract

This study examines the effects of profitability, leverage, and institutional ownership on sustainability disclosure and firm value among banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2021–2024, addressing persistent variation in disclosure quality despite the rapid rise in sustainability-reporting compliance. Using a quantitative, explanatory design with Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS), the study analyzes 136 firm-year observations from 34 banks selected through purposive sampling. The structural model explains 26.2% of the variance in firm value (R² = 0.262) and 10.8% of the variance in sustainability disclosure (R² = 0.108). Leverage (β = −0.214; p = 0.004) and institutional ownership (β = −0.273; p = 0.001) significantly and negatively affect sustainability disclosure, whereas profitability shows no significant effect (β = 0.020; p = 0.819). Sustainability disclosure (β = 0.392; p < 0.001), profitability (β = 0.135; p = 0.001), and institutional ownership (β = −0.176; p = 0.046) significantly affect firm value, while leverage exerts no significant direct effect (p = 0.206). Sustainability disclosure fully mediates the leverage–firm value relationship (p = 0.009) and partially mediates the institutional ownership–firm value relationship (p = 0.002), but does not mediate the profitability–firm value relationship (p = 0.820). By repositioning sustainability disclosure as a mediating mechanism and applying a banking-adjusted GRI checklist within a highly leveraged, capital-regulated industry, this study provides novel evidence that sustainability disclosure functions as a critical non-financial channel linking financial and governance characteristics to firm value. The findings offer practical implications for bank management seeking to strengthen disclosure quality and for regulators, including Indonesia's Financial Services Authority (OJK) and the Indonesian Institute of Accountants (IAI), in advancing forthcoming sustainability-disclosure standards.
Sustainability reporting, liquidity, and audit report lag: Evidence from Indonesian mining companies Nathania Rachel Queen Rondonuwu; Jullie Jeannete Sondakh; ⁠Anneke Wangkar
The Contrarian : Finance, Accounting, and Business Research Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Widyantara Nawasena Raharja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58784/cfabr.459

Abstract

The interval between a company's fiscal year-end and the issuance date of the independent auditor's report or Audit report lag (ARL) is a critical indicator of financial reporting timeliness. Despite growing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure requirements in Indonesia, empirical evidence on how sustainability reporting quality influences audit timeliness in the extractive sector remains limited and inconclusive. Drawing on Signaling Theory (Spence, 1973) and Agency Theory (Jensen & Meckling, 1976), this study examines the effects of sustainability reporting and liquidity on audit report lag in mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during 2022–2024. A quantitative, associative approach was employed with purposive sampling, yielding 41 companies and 123 firm-year observations. Data were analyzed using panel data regression with Fixed Effects and Random Effects models (Hausman test applied), incorporating control variables (firm size, profitability, leverage, and auditor type). The results show that sustainability reporting does not significantly affect audit report lag, while liquidity has a significant positive effect on audit report lag. The liquidity finding suggests that companies with higher current asset volumes require more extensive audit procedures, thereby prolonging the audit process. These findings contribute to the ARL literature by providing sector-specific evidence from the Indonesian mining industry and offer practical implications for audit planning and corporate governance.