Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Tasyri' : Jurnal Muamalah dan Ekonomi Syariah
Sispa Maulida
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Filosofis dan Etika Bisnis Islam Terhadap Kasus Kuliner Nonhalal Rumah Makan Ayam Goreng Widuran di Kota Solo Sispa Maulida; Fitri Madani; AkneNabila Novita
Tasyri' : Jurnal Muamalah dan Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): TASYRI’: Jurnal Muamalah dan Ekonomi Syari’ah
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum dan Ekonomi Syariah Institut Agama Islam Pangeran Dharma Kusuma Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55656/tjmes.v8i2.679

Abstract

The case of the Ayam Goreng Widuran restaurant in Solo City has attracted public attention after it was discovered that they used pig fat in the preparation of their menu items without labeling them as non-halal or providing clear information to consumers. The fried chicken with crispy batter, which is the signature dish of the restaurant, is suspected to be cooked using non-halal oil, specifically pig fat. This research aims to analyze the issue thru two main perspectives, namely maqāṣid asy-syarī‘ah and Islamic business ethics, and to determine the extent to which the business practices align or conflict with the objectives of Sharia and moral principles in business activities. This research uses a descriptive qualitative research approach, specifically a library research type. Data collection techniques thru observation and documentation. The research results show that the actions of the business actors are contrary to maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, especially the principles of ḥifẓ al-dīn, ḥifẓ al-nafs, and ḥifẓ al-māl, because they cause harm to Muslim consumers who need certainty of halal. In addition, the business actors do not apply the principles of Islamic business ethics, particularly the principles of honesty (ṣiddīq), trust (amānah), intelligence (faṭānah), and being friendly and communicative (tablīgh).
Between Legal Certainty and Judicial Inconsistency: An Analysis of the Legal Consequences of Default Judgments in Simplified Sharia Economic Litigation Akne Nabila Novita; Sispa Maulida; Fitri Madani; Hilda Rahmatul Jannah
Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Vol 23 No 1 (2026): Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Jurai Siwo Lampung, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/istinbath.v23i01.13620

Abstract

The application of default judgments in the resolution of simple Sharia economic lawsuits still raises issues regarding the consistency of applying the legal consequences of a defendant’s failure to appear. These inconsistencies in application have the potential to create legal uncertainty and affect the consistency of judicial practice in economic cases of sharia. This study aims to analyze the application of the legal consequences of default judgments in simple Islamic economic lawsuits and identify the factors causing inconsistencies in their application through an analysis of Magetan Religious Court Decisions No. 49/Pdt.G.S/2025/PA.Mgt and No. 102/Pdt.G.S/2025/PA.Mgt. This study employed a normative legal method with a juridical approach. The data were analyzed descriptively and comparatively by comparing judges’ reasoning in both decisions, utilizing the concept of recognition in civil procedure law, the theory of legal discovery, and the theory of legal certainty. The results indicate that both decisions based their reasoning on Article 125 of the HIR (Dutch Civil Code), yet differed in applying the legal consequences of a default judgment. Judgment No. 49/Pdt.G.S/2025/PA.Mgt still conducted a substantive review of the legal relationship between the parties, resulting in the claim being granted in part, whereas Judgment No. 102/Pdt.G.S/2025/PA.Mgt granted the entire claim after the evidence was deemed sufficient to support the plaintiffs’ arguments. These differences indicate the absence of a uniform standard in interpreting the relationship between the defendant’s absence, admission, and the burden of proof. This study concludes that the lack of clear guidelines regarding the application of the legal consequences of default has the potential to lead to inconsistent rulings and undermine legal certainty in the resolution of Islamic economic disputes. [Penerapan putusan verstek dalam penyelesaian gugatan sederhana ekonomi syariah masih menyisakan persoalan terkait konsistensi penerapan akibat hukum dari ketidakhadiran tergugat. Perbedaan penerapan tersebut berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum serta memengaruhi konsistensi praktik peradilan dalam perkara ekonomi syariah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan akibat hukum putusan verstek dalam gugatan sederhana ekonomi syariah serta mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan inkonsistensi penerapannya melalui analisis terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Magetan Nomor 49/Pdt.G.S/2025/PA.Mgt dan Nomor 102/Pdt.G.S/2025/PA.Mgt. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif-komparatif melalui perbandingan pertimbangan hakim dalam kedua putusan dengan menggunakan konsep pengakuan dalam hukum acara perdata, teori penemuan hukum, dan teori kepastian hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedua putusan sama-sama mendasarkan pertimbangannya pada Pasal 125 HIR, namun berbeda dalam menerapkan akibat hukum verstek. Putusan Nomor 49/Pdt.G.S/2025/PA.Mgt tetap melakukan pengujian substantif terhadap hubungan hukum para pihak sehingga gugatan dikabulkan sebagian, sedangkan Putusan Nomor 102/Pdt.G.S/2025/PA.Mgt mengabulkan seluruh gugatan setelah alat bukti dinilai cukup mendukung dalil penggugat. Perbedaan tersebut menunjukkan belum adanya standar yang seragam dalam memaknai hubungan antara ketidakhadiran tergugat, pengakuan, dan pembuktian. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa ketiadaan pedoman yang jelas mengenai penerapan akibat hukum verstek berpotensi menimbulkan inkonsistensi putusan dan mengurangi kepastian hukum dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah].
Co-Authors Akne Nabila Novita AkneNabila Novita Fitri Madani Hilda Rahmatul Jannah