Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Nuzula Sari
Universitas Jember
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Konstitusional PraRatifikasi Perjanjian Internasional: Studi Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia dan Hungaria yuvita Mardiana; Nuzula Sari; Yusuf Adiwibowo
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Tema Hukum Internasional
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i1.3839

Abstract

The increasing involvement of states in international treaties creates tensions between international obligations and constitutional supremacy. Indonesia does not yet have a constitutional pre-ratification review mechanism, putting it at risk of both domestic unconstitutionality and international liability. In contrast, Hungary implements preventive review based on the 2011 Hungarian Constitution (Alaptörvény), supported by the 2011 CLI Law on the Constitutional Court, reflecting a fundamentally different constitutional design. Using normative legal research through comparative and conceptual approaches, this study finds that the existing ex post review model in Indonesia creates systemic vulnerabilities not present in Hungary's ex ante system. As a novelty, this study offers a three-tier adaptation model encompassing constitutional amendments, legislative revisions and progressive judicial interpretation to integrate constitutional pre-ratification review into the Indonesian legal system. The proposed model positions Pancasila as the staatsfundamentalnorm in the constitutional review of international treaties, an element not present in the Hungarian constitutional framework.
Kepastian Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/Puu-Xix/2021 dalam Perspektif Globalisasi Ekonomi: Studi Perbandingan dengan Inggris dan Afrika Selatan Bambang Wahyono; nuzula Sari; Yusuf Adiwibowo
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Tema Hukum Internasional
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i1.3981

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision No.2/PUU-XIX/2021 limits the unilateral enforcement of fiduciary guarantees by requiring a judicial process if the debtor objects to a breach of contract. This study aims to analyze the legal certainty of fiduciary guarantees after the ruling from the perspective of economic globalization through a comparative study with the United Kingdom and South Africa. The research method used is normative law with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results show that Indonesia has shifted from an execution model to judicial execution. The United Kingdom and South Africa continue to maintain unilateral execution with more measurable debtor protection mechanisms. This study recommends the reconstruction of Article 15 of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law to balance legal certainty, economic efficiency, and debtor protection.
Co-Authors Bambang Wahyono Yusuf Adiwibowo yuvita Mardiana