p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Biologi Tropis
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Immune Pathogenesis and Risk Factors Associated with Leprosy (Hansen's Disease) Alfira Safitri; Ni Luh Putu Eka Widya Ananta Putri
Jurnal Biologi Tropis Vol. 26 No. 3 (2026): Juli - September
Publisher : Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jbt.v26i3.11904

Abstract

Leprosy (Hansen’s disease) is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae and remains a significant public health problem in many endemic countries, including Indonesia. This study aimed to review the immune pathogenesis and associated risk factors of leprosy based on recent scientific evidence. A narrative literature review was conducted using articles retrieved from PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and World Health Organization (WHO) databases, published between 2015 and 2025. The literature search applied predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and study selection was performed through title, abstract, and full-text screening. A total of 4,791 records were identified from all databases, and 31 articles were included in the final analysis. The selected literature was synthesized using a descriptive approach. The clinical spectrum of leprosy is determined by the interaction between M. leprae and the host immune response. Tuberculoid leprosy is associated with a dominant T helper 1 (Th1) response characterized by increased interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production and enhanced macrophage activation, while lepromatous leprosy is associated with a T helper 2 (Th2)-dominant response characterized by elevated interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-5 (IL-5), and interleukin-10 (IL-10), leading to ineffective bacterial clearance. Emerging evidence also highlights the roles of T helper 17 (Th17) and regulatory T (Treg) cells in immune modulation and disease progression. In addition, host and environmental factors such as age, sex, history of contact, housing conditions, personal hygiene, and Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccination status contribute to susceptibility and transmission.
Comparative Effectiveness of Luliconazole, Sertaconazole, and Terbinafine for Tinea Corporis and Tinea Cruris: A Systematic Review Ni Luh Putu Eka Widya Ananta Putri; Marisa Syavitri Dilaga
Jurnal Biologi Tropis Vol. 26 No. 3 (2026): Juli - September
Publisher : Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jbt.v26i3.13063

Abstract

Dermatophytosis (tinea corporis and tinea cruris) is a superficial fungal infection with a high prevalence in tropical regions. The WHO has reported cases of resistance to antifungal treatments. Topical antifungals from the allylamine (terbinafine) and azole (sertaconazole and luliconazole) classes are widely used; however, evidence regarding their comparative head-to-head effectiveness is inconsistent and has not yet been systematically synthesized with rigorous methodological quality assessment. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness, mycological cure rates, cost-effectiveness, and safety of topical terbinafine, sertaconazole, and luliconazole for tinea corporis and tinea cruris through a systematic review. A literature search was conducted using Publish or Perish across Google Scholar (n=200) and PubMed (n=16), yielding 216 articles. Following deduplication via Covidence (17 duplicates), title/abstract screening, and full-text review, nine studies met the final eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for RCTs (13 items); six studies scoring >50% were included in the narrative synthesis. Results showed that comparisons between sertaconazole and terbinafine (four studies) consistently demonstrated equivalent effectiveness, although one high-quality study reported sertaconazole to be superior in terms of rapid relief from pruritus and achieving mycological cure. In one study of moderate quality, luliconazole demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in symptom scores compared to terbinafine. Sertaconazole showed higher clinical effectiveness than luliconazole, yet luliconazole was superior in terms of cost-effectiveness in one moderate-quality study. All three drugs were reported to be safe and well-tolerated. In conclusion, the three antifungal agents demonstrate generally comparable effectiveness in the management of tinea corporis and tinea cruris infections, although sertaconazole and luliconazole tend to outperform terbinafine in certain parameters across some studies.