Rika Yani
Universitas PGRI Sumenep

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

When synthetic speech becomes evidence: linguistic authentication and evidentiary uncertainty in Indonesian deepfake cases Rika Yani
Indonesian Journal of Linguistics and Legal Discourse Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Artificial intelligence, linguistic vulnerability, and digital justice in Indon
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijll.v1i2.919

Abstract

Background: Synthetic speech and audio deepfakes increasingly unsettle legal assumptions that a recorded voice can index speaker identity, communicative intention, and evidentiary presence in Indonesian digital-public discourse. Objective: This study examines how synthetic or disputed speech becomes evidentially meaningful by analysing the linguistic authentication, evidentiary uncertainty, and procedural positioning of deepfake-related public documents in Indonesia. Method: Using a qualitative corpus-assisted legal-linguistic design, this study analyses 24 publicly verifiable documents consisting of official enforcement releases, fact-checking records, news reports, legal-context documents, and scholarly sources. Results: The findings show that authentication is constructed through convergence among detector claims, source tracing, official-account verification, platform context, and institutional classification rather than through acoustic judgement alone. Evidentiary uncertainty is not treated as a defect to be removed, but as a structured stance expressed through probability, absence, methodological caution, and legal-contextual framing. Implication: Synthetic speech is procedurally positioned most often through public verification and fact-checking before it enters, or potentially enters, formal adjudicative settings. Novelty: This study offers a novel forensic-linguistic account of deepfake evidence by shifting analysis from technical detection toward the legal-discursive process through which synthetic speech is authenticated, contested, and made evidentially intelligible under uncertainty.
Populism in popular literature: the political rhetoric of the ‘people’ in Indonesian bestseller novels Rika Yani
Indonesian Journal of Politics and Literary Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Political discourse and representation in Indonesian literature
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijpl.v1i1.535

Abstract

Background: The convergence of populist discourse and popular culture in post-Reformasi Indonesia positions bestselling novels as key sites for political meaning-making. Objective: This study examines how Indonesian bestseller novels construct “the people,” oppose elites, and normalize populist logic. Method: A qualitative approach integrates Critical Discourse Analysis, narrative analysis, and populist rhetoric. Results: Novels portray “the people” as morally virtuous against corrupt elites, using polarized discourse, emotional narratives, and simplified rhetoric to legitimize populist views. Implication: These findings show that popular literature functions as a cultural infrastructure shaping everyday political imagination. Novelty: This study provides an integrative framework linking discourse, narrative, and populist rhetoric to reveal how literary texts normalize populism beyond formal politics.