Maulida Hasanah
Institut Agama Islam Darul Ulum Kandangan

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Syura ke Pemilu: Evolusi Konsep Kepemimpinan dalam Islam Maulida Hasanah; Akhmad Zaki Yamani
Ahsan: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan Vol 2 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : PT. Pustaka Andil Lestari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67802/ahsan.v2i1.35

Abstract

This study examines general elections (pemilu) as a modern political mechanism that can serve as a contemporary alternative to the khilafah system in Islamic political tradition. Using theological and historical-political approaches, this study explores the fundamental differences between the centralist khilafah system, which is based on religious legitimacy, and the electoral system rooted in popular participation and sovereignty of law. The analysis focuses on the concepts of imamah, syura, and bai’ah in classical Islamic political thought and how these principles have transformed in the context of modern democracy. The study also reviews the responses of various groups, both proponents and opponents of electoral systems, and the normative arguments used to legitimize or reject it. The findings suggest that while khilafah is seen as an ideal system in classical literature, elections can be understood as a relevant instrument within maqashid shariah, ensuring justice, participation, and representation for the ummah. Thus, elections are not simply a Western product but can be contextualized within the framework of Islamic politics as a form of contemporary ijtihad.
Hukuman Pidana Dalam Islam: Analisis Konseptual, Maqāṣid Asy-Syarī‘ah, Dan Relevansi Kontemporer Maulida Hasanah; Muna Hasanah; Noormala Santi; Lahmudinur
Ahsan: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : PT. Pustaka Andil Lestari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67802/ahsan.vi.68

Abstract

Islamic criminal law, or fiqh jinayah, plays a crucial role within the religious legal framework that governs social life. Its primary purpose is to safeguard the five fundamental principles of the Sharia, namely the protection of religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property. This study aims to analyze the foundational concepts of punishment in Islam, including the categories of hudud, qisas-diyat, and ta’zir, while also examining how these legal concepts relate to contemporary legal systems. The research gap addressed in this study lies in the limited comprehensive analyses that integrate the perspective of maqasid al-shariah with constitutional challenges and human rights issues in contemporary Islamic criminal law discourse, particularly within Indonesian scholarship over the past five years. Therefore, this research offers novelty through an interpretative approach that combines normative-theological principles with an analytical examination of modern legal regulations. The sources examined include the Qur’an, Hadith, classical fiqh works, as well as academic literature and recent studies published between 2020 and 2025. The data were analyzed using content analysis and analytical comparison techniques, while data validation employed source triangulation by comparing scriptural texts, classical juristic opinions, and contemporary research findings. The results show that the implementation of Islamic criminal law today faces various challenges, especially those related to constitutional frameworks, legal pluralism, and human rights concerns. However, through an approach grounded in maqasid al-shariah and the principle of proportionality, Islamic criminal law can be reinterpreted to remain relevant, humane, and aligned with substantive justice.