Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ISME: Journal of Islamic Studies and Multidisciplinary Research
Dwi Sukmanila Sayska
IAIN Takengon, Takengon, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tafsir Bi-Ra'yi; Hukum dan Kedudukannya dalam Syariat Islam Muhammad Arif; Dwi Sukmanila Sayska
ISME : Journal of Islamic Studies and Multidisciplinary Research Vol 3 No 1 (2025): ISME : Journal of Islamic Studies and Multidisciplinary Research
Publisher : Yayasan Dharma Lentera Khatulistiwa (MALEWA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61683/isme.vol31.2025.83-91

Abstract

In general, the interpretation of the Quran is divided into to methods; tafsir bil-ma'tsur (based on history) and tafsir bi ar-ra'yi (rational based). The validity of the bil-ma'tsur interpretation method is beyond doubt because the interpretation was quoted directly from the bearer of the message of the Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, as well as from his students, the Companions and the generation after that, namely the Tabiin.  However, with regard to Tafsir bi-ra'yi, the scholars have different opinions about it. Some forbid it and some allow it. However, after studying it more deeply, it turns out that these differences are only lafzhi (formality) because both of them agree that it is haram to interpret the al-Qur’an with opinion (ra'yu) alone. As for interpreting the al-Qur’an based on knowledge, that is permissible. Of course, the science referred to here is sharia science such as ulumul Qurán, hadith, fiqh, ushul fiqh, arabic and so on so that the interpretation does not deviate from the values ​​that are standard in the Islamic religion. For this reason the Ulama established several rules and regulations for interpreting the al-Qur’an with reason (logic). The aim of this research is to thoroughly examine the position of bi-ra'yi interpretation in Islam by finding evidence from the al-Quran, hadith and the practices of the Salaf. This study uses qualitative methods with data collection techniques in the form of descriptive analysis and literature study. The results of the study found that interpreting the al-Quran should not be based solely on opinion (ra'yu). Bi-Ra'yi interpretation can only be accepted if it is supported by Sharia arguments, namely the al-Quran, Hadith and the opinions of the salaf scholars.
Kontroversi Tafsir Ilmi Dalam Penafsiran: Antara I’jaz Ilmiah dan Dakhil Penafsiran Muhammad Arif; Dwi Sukmanila Sayska; Irhas
ISME : Journal of Islamic Studies and Multidisciplinary Research Vol 4 No 1 (2026): ISME : Journal of Islamic Studies and Multidisciplinary Research
Publisher : Yayasan Dharma Lentera Khatulistiwa (MALEWA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61683/isme.vol41.2026.18-28

Abstract

Scientific Interpretation is a Qur’anic interpretive approach that employs scientific knowledge to explain verses related to natural phenomena (ayat-ayat kauniyah). Its emergence has generated considerable debate among Muslim scholars. Some regard it as a manifestation of the Qur’an’s scientific miraculousness (i‘jaz ‘ilmi), demonstrating the harmony between revelation and scientific advancement, while others consider it a form of extraneous interpretation (Dakhil fi al-tafsir) that imposes modern scientific theories upon the Qur’anic text. This article aims to examine the position of scientific Interpretation within the Islamic Interpretation tradition by analyzing the arguments of both its proponents and critics. The study employs a qualitative library research method through a critical review of classical and contemporary scholarly works. The findings indicate that supporters of scientific Interpretation view it as a means of demonstrating the miraculous nature of the Qur’an, reconciling religion and science, and strengthening faith. In contrast, its critics argue that it may lead to interpretations that depart from the apparent meaning of the text, neglect contextual considerations, and tie Qur’anic meanings to scientific theories that are inherently tentative and subject to change. This study concludes that scientific Interpretation can be accepted when applied proportionally, without forcing scientific meanings onto the text, while remaining consistent with established principles of Arabic linguistics and Qur’anic interpretation, and relying only on well-established scientific facts. Under these conditions, scientific Interpretation may enrich the understanding of Qur’anic cosmological verses without undermining the primary function of the Qur’an as divine guidance.
Co-Authors Irhas Muhammad Arif Muhammad Arif