Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Telaah Journal of Media, Sciences and Education
Emiliyati, Emiliyati
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbedaan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) dan Project Based Learning (PjBL) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik di SMA Negeri 3 Mataram Winata, Aliahardi; Sanusi, Novi Sundari; Emiliyati, Emiliyati; Misnawati, Misnawati; Muliati, Muliati; Khoiriah, Khifayatul; Husnadian, Alfan
Jurnal Ilmiah Telaah Vol 9, No 2: July 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/telaah.v9i2.24606

Abstract

Abstrak: Penggunaan dua model pembelajaran yaitu problem based learning dan project based learning dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik karena berdasarkan hasil observasi awal saat pelaksanaan PPL 1 bahwa proses belajar mengajar lebih menekankan pada penggunaan dua model pembelajaran. Tujuan dilakukan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis perbedaan penggunaan model pembelajaran PBL dan  PjBL terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik di SMA Negeri 3 Mataram. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian tindakan kelas dengan populasi penelitian adalah kelas XI IPS 2 di SMAN 3 Mataram. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi. Instrumen yang dipakai yaitu lembar observasi, dan catatan lapangan yang dipakai untuk memperoleh data secara objektif yang tidak dapat terekam melalui lembar observasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dari siklus pertama hingga siklus ketiga, terjadi peningkatan yang konsisten dalam pencapaian hasil belajar peserta didik, dengan nilai rata-rata mencapai 42,5%pada siklus pertama, meningkat menjadi 60,6 % pada siklus kedua, dan mencapai 75,7% pada siklus ketiga. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran PBL dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik jika dibandingkan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran PjBL dan mendorong kemampuan peserta didik dalam membangun pemikiran kritisnya serta mampu dalam berkolaborasi, menghargai pendapat, serta mampu menganalisis permasalahan yang terjadi di lingkungan sekitarnya.
PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN DIFERENSIASI PADA MATERI KONSEP GEOGRAFI MELALUI PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) KELAS X4 SMAN 4 MATARAM Emiliyati, Emiliyati
Jurnal Pengetahuan dan Pendidikan Vol 2 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Yayasan Baru Haji Samsudin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Minister of Education and Culture for Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia emphasized that the ideals of learning in Indonesia are to create learning that is in favour of students, knowing that it liberates thinking and student potential. Efforts to adapt the learning process in class to meet the learning needs of each student. This research aims to learn how to apply differentiation learning in geography concept material through problem-based learning to X.4 SMAN 4 Mataram. Then this study used a descriptive method after identifying the forms of implementation of percentages and group collaboration and explaining whether the student results were excellent. The results of this study indicate that the application of Differentiated Learning Based on Problem-Based Learning can produce a Pancasila learning profile and increase student motivation and learning outcomes. I implemented the learning design in class X4 SMAN 4 MATARAM to improve enthusiasm, motivation and student learning outcomes following the profile of Pancasila students. Thus the implementation of Differentiated Learning Based on Problem-Based Learning can be carried out well, achieving learning objectives and applying student learning profiles by identifying. Mapping student learning needs naturally and efficiently and carrying out process assessments in groups and individually. When evaluating understanding individually, it is proven that the results/scores achieved are well above average
Co-Authors Husnadian, Alfan Khoiriah, Khifayatul Misnawati Misnawati Muliati Muliati, Muliati Sanusi, Novi Sundari Winata, Aliahardi