Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Eprina Mawati Br. Siboro
Universitas Tangerang Raya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbedaan Mekanisme Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Berat di Aceh dan Daerah Lain di Indonesia Lala Lala; Rahmiati Rahmiati; Eprina Mawati Br. Siboro
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 12 (2026): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i12.4515

Abstract

This article analyzes the different mechanisms for resolving gross human rights violations through the Human Rights Court under Law Number 26 of 2000 and the Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission under Aceh Qanun Number 17 of 2013. Using normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, it finds that the two mechanisms do not conflict de jure because their powers, procedures and legal outputs are distinct. The Human Rights Court focuses on criminal accountability, whereas the Aceh TRC emphasizes truth-seeking, reparations and reconciliation. De facto, however, they continue to operate in parallel without protocols for data exchange, case referral, witness and victim protection and the implementation of reparations. Integration is scientifically necessary not to homogenize their mandates, but because victims’ rights to justice, truth, protection, recovery and guarantees of non-recurrence are interdependent. Without integration, victims face repeated testimony, data confidentiality risks, disconnected legal referrals and unimplemented recovery recommendations. An integrative model should therefore link the Aceh TRC, LPSK, Komnas HAM, the Attorney General’s Office, the Human Rights Court and government institutions while preserving institutional independence, victims’ consent, confidentiality and due process of law.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Perempuan Korban Kekerasan Seksual dalam Rumah Tangga: Studi Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn Kng Hanna Noviana; Rahmiati; Eprina Mawati Br. Siboro
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 12 (2026): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i12.4523

Abstract

Legal protection for women with mental disabilities who experience sexual violence in domestic settings requires both criminal accountability and victim recovery. This normative legal study applies statutory and case approaches to Decision Number 44/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Kng. Law Number 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence is treated as the legal basis applicable to the case, while Law Number 3 of 2026 on Witness and Victim Protection, Law Number 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code, Law Number 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities and Law Number 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes are used as current evaluative standards for victim protection. The findings show that the decision provided repressive protection through punishment and recognized the victim's vulnerability in the evidentiary assessment. However, the judicial reasoning did not expressly address the victim's rights and restitution, assistance, psychological rehabilitation and social recovery were not incorporated into the operative part of the judgment. Under the current legal framework, victim protection should include security, information, assistance, disability accommodation, restitution and sustained recovery.
Co-Authors Hanna Noviana Lala Lala Rahmiati Rahmiati Rahmiati