Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Nusantara Islam Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Ahmad Ma’mun Fikri
Universitas Islam Nusantara, Bandung
Religion Arts Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementation of Government Regulation Number 53 of 2010 in Addressing the Practice of Extortion in Detention Centers Agung Novarianto; Ahmad Ma’mun Fikri
Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jis.v6i3.56013

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of Government Regulation Number 53 of 2010 concerning Civil Servant Discipline as a measure to combat the practice of illicit levies (*pungli*) in detention centers. The phenomenon of illicit levies within the correctional system reveals a gap between legal norms and actual practice, characterized by weak internal oversight, inconsistent sanctioning, and a culture among Civil Servants (ASN) that tolerates such practices. The study employs a normative-juridical approach supported by empirical data. The analysis utilizes the concept of the rule of law and Friedman’s theory of law enforcement, which emphasizes the importance of legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture. The findings indicate that weaknesses in these three aspects are the primary factors fueling the prevalence of illicit levies. Proposed recommendations include strengthening information technology-based internal and external oversight, enforcing strict and consistent disciplinary sanctions, fostering Civil Servant integrity through anti-corruption education, and enhancing public participation in oversight. Implementing these recommendations is expected to minimize illicit levy practices, thereby better upholding Civil Servant integrity and rule-of-law principles within the correctional system.
Universal Health Insurance in Law and Public Policy Perspective: A Comparative Study of Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia Aprisia Nestnyta Waworuntu; Sherwin Farell Manueke; Ahmad Ma’mun Fikri
International Journal of Nusantara Islam Vol 13 No 2 (2025): International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ijni.v13i2.58615

Abstract

This study provides a comparative analysis of the implementation of universal health insurance laws in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia within the frameworks of health law and public policy, grounded in Universal Health Coverage principles. Employing a normative legal methodology—incorporating literature reviews and comparative legal analysis—the paper examines the regulatory frameworks, institutional governance, and implementation mechanisms of BPJS Kesehatan (Indonesia), PhilHealth under the Universal Health Care Act (Philippines), and the tax-funded public healthcare system in Malaysia. The findings reveal distinct institutional approaches: mandatory social health insurance in Indonesia, automatic enrollment in the Philippines, and tax-financed direct service provision in Malaysia. Effectiveness depends not only on coverage and financing but also on regulatory design, governance quality, and accountability. Key challenges include contribution compliance, fraud risks, and fiscal sustainability. The study recommends strengthening regulatory integration, institutional transparency, and national health information systems, while emphasizing social equity and accountability to safeguard the right to health. This report contributes to the field of comparative health law by highlighting regulatory coherence, governance, and fiscal capacity as critical factors for the effectiveness of Universal Health Coverage in Southeast Asia.
Universal Health Insurance in Law and Public Policy Perspective: A Comparative Study of Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia Aprisia Nestnyta Waworuntu; Sherwin Farell Manueke; Ahmad Ma’mun Fikri
International Journal of Nusantara Islam Vol 13 No 2 (2025): International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ijni.v13i2.58615

Abstract

This study provides a comparative analysis of the implementation of universal health insurance laws in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia within the frameworks of health law and public policy, grounded in Universal Health Coverage principles. Employing a normative legal methodology—incorporating literature reviews and comparative legal analysis—the paper examines the regulatory frameworks, institutional governance, and implementation mechanisms of BPJS Kesehatan (Indonesia), PhilHealth under the Universal Health Care Act (Philippines), and the tax-funded public healthcare system in Malaysia. The findings reveal distinct institutional approaches: mandatory social health insurance in Indonesia, automatic enrollment in the Philippines, and tax-financed direct service provision in Malaysia. Effectiveness depends not only on coverage and financing but also on regulatory design, governance quality, and accountability. Key challenges include contribution compliance, fraud risks, and fiscal sustainability. The study recommends strengthening regulatory integration, institutional transparency, and national health information systems, while emphasizing social equity and accountability to safeguard the right to health. This report contributes to the field of comparative health law by highlighting regulatory coherence, governance, and fiscal capacity as critical factors for the effectiveness of Universal Health Coverage in Southeast Asia.
Co-Authors Agung Novarianto Aprisia Nestnyta Waworuntu Sherwin Farell Manueke