This Author published in this journals
All Journal JPLED
Ramanda Salsabila
Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MASTERY OF SARCASTIC AND PERSONIFICATION FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE AND THE ABILITY TO WRITE FANTASY STORY TEXTS OF SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS PHASE D SMP NEGERI 2 PAINAN Ramanda Salsabila; Trisna Helda; Rahayu Fitri
Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development (JPLED) in Press
Publisher : Global Action and Education for Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58737/jpled.v6i3.1219

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relationship between mastery of sarcastic and personification figurative language and the skills in writing fantasy story texts of Class VII Phase D students at SMP Negeri 2 Painan. The type of research used is quantitative with a correlational method. The research population consisted of 118 students. The sampling technique in this study used simple random sampling with a sample size of 31 people. The research instruments were an objective test of mastery of figures of speech and a performance test of writing skills in fantasy story texts. The tests were analyzed using the product moment and t-test. The research results can be concluded in three points, as follows. First, the mastery of figures of speech of seventh-grade students in Phase D at SMP Negeri 2 Painan is at a good qualification with an average score of 85.32. Second, the results of the fantasy story writing skills test of seventh-grade students in Phase D at SMP Negeri 2 Painan are at a very good qualification with an average score of 87.63. Third, there is a significant positive relationship between the mastery of figures of speech and the fantasy story writing skills of seventh-grade students in Phase D at SMP Negeri 2 Painan with a degree of freedom of n-1 (31-1=30) and a 95% significance level. H₀ is rejected and H₁ is accepted because the calculated t is greater than the table t, namely 12.96 > 1.68.