Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Model Pemilu Serentak Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024 Nur Kholis Majid; Afthon Yazid
Sanskara Hukum dan HAM Vol. 5 No. 01 (2026): Sanskara Hukum dan HAM (SHH)
Publisher : Eastasouth Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/shh.v5i01.840

Abstract

The implementation of the simultaneous "five boxes" election model in 2019 and 2024 has caused various complex problems for organizers, election participants, and voters, both at the central and regional levels. Therefore, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 mandates the separation of national and regional elections. This research aims to analyze the considerations of the Constitutional Court's decision and the shift in the paradigm of simultaneity, analyze the separation of national and regional elections from a utilitarian perspective, and formulate an election model after the Constitutional Court's decision. The research method applied is normative juridical (doctrinal). This research uses a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. Research data were collected thru literature study. Data sources include primary, secondary, and tertiary data. Next, the data is analyzed qualitatively. Broadly speaking, there are four dimensions that form the basis of the Court's consideration in the decision, namely the philosophical, sociological, juridical, and technical dimensions. From a utilitarian perspective, the separation of national and regional elections is beneficial for improving the quality of democracy, optimizing the performance of election organizers and public participation, strengthening internal party strategies, and enhancing government accountability. The simultaneous election model after the Constitutional Court's decision is a national election held simultaneously in 2029 and interim elections with an interval of two to two and a half years.
Reaktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Mengatasi Polarisasi Digital di Indonesia Nur Kholis Majid; Afthon Yazid
Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Jayapangus Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37329/metta.v6i3.5612

Abstract

The polarization of opinion in the digital space has posed a risk to social cohesion and the integrity of the Indonesian nation. Digital transformation has changed the way democracy and social relations are conducted. This study aims to examine the juridical construction of digital polarization in the Indonesian legal framework, the threat of digital polarization to the values of national unity, and the concept of reactualization of Pancasila values to overcome digital polarization. This research uses normative legal methods with legislative, conceptual, and philosophical approaches. The collection of research legal materials was carried out through literature studies, then analyzed prescriptively. This research reveals that the regulation of digital polarization in Indonesia has a normative foundation. Digital polarization has been proven to threaten the implementation of Pancasila values and has an impact on declining the quality of public deliberation, weakening social cohesion, and shifting people's orientation from national identity to group identity. The reactualization of Pancasila values is realized through the harmonization of regulations, strengthening accountable digital platform governance, increasing digital literacy and digital citizenship, and collaboration between the government, digital platform operators, educational institutions, civil society, and the public as users of digital space.