Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Alignment of German Vocabulary Content in Loecsen with the Cefr A1 Communicative Functions Haidar Fathurozi; Irma Permatawati; Pepen Permana
Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 8 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v5i8.553

Abstract

Vocabulary is a fundamental component of foreign language learning, particularly at the beginner level. Digital applications can support independent vocabulary acquisition; however, their content needs to align with learners’ proficiency targets. This research analyzed the suitability of German vocabulary content in the Loecsen application with the communicative functions of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) A1 level and identified features that support or limit its use as a learning medium. This study employed a descriptive qualitative design using content analysis. The data consisted of 17 German-learning themes in Loecsen, including vocabulary items, expressions, audio materials, visual illustrations, and learning features. The data were inventoried, mapped against CEFR A1 descriptors, and categorized as appropriate or partially appropriate. The findings showed that 13 of the 17 themes were appropriate for CEFR A1 because they supported basic communication needs, including self-introduction, daily interactions, requesting and providing simple information, transportation, accommodation, and basic transactions. Four themes, namely “Gefühle,” “Bar,” “Strand,” and “Bei Problemen,” were considered partially appropriate because they contained several context-specific or relatively complex expressions that required further selection and adaptation. Loecsen’s audio pronunciation, visual illustrations, and situational organization supported contextual vocabulary learning. However, the application did not explicitly classify materials according to CEFR levels and lacked structured exercises, feedback mechanisms, and evaluation activities. Therefore, Loecsen was considered more suitable as a supplementary learning medium rather than a primary resource for German A1 vocabulary learners.