Hamdan Hasan
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF JASSER AUDA'S MAQASID AL SHARIAH: AN INTEGRATIVE ANALYSIS OF LINEAGE, MAINTENANCE, INHERITANCE, AND CHILD PROTECTION POLICIES Irfan Hadi; Hamdan Hasan; Marini Abdul Djalal
Sharia Oikonomia Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/solj.v4i3.4210

Abstract

This study examines the protection of the rights of children born out of wedlock from the perspective of Jasser Auda’s contemporary maqasid al-shariah, supported by recent scholarly literature. The legal status of children born out of wedlock has long been dominated by classical Islamic jurisprudence, which tends to adopt a textual approach and may consequently give rise to social stigma, legal discrimination, and limited fulfillment of children’s rights. This study employs a library research method with a qualitative-philosophical approach to analyze legal reconstruction through the systems approach developed by Jasser Auda. The findings demonstrate that the contemporary maqasid paradigm shifts the orientation of ?if? al-nasl from merely preserving the legitimacy of lineage (nasab) toward ensuring comprehensive protection of children’s rights and human dignity. This reconstruction underscores the importance of recognizing biological parentage, fulfilling children’s maintenance (nafaqah) rights, and safeguarding their economic welfare through legal instruments such as the obligatory bequest (wa?iyyah w?jibah) and inter vivos gifts (hibah). Furthermore, the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 and the Child Protection Law demonstrate a convergence with the systems-based maq??id paradigm by prioritizing the best interests of the child. Therefore, the protection of the rights of children born out of wedlock should be implemented in a manner that is just, humane, and free from all forms of discrimination.
Abortion in Islamic Legal Reasoning: Reconstructing Maslahah and Necessity in Contemporary Reproductive Ethics Hamdan Hasan; Machmud Dzulkiram M. Chaeruddin; Marini Abdul Djalal; Harwis Alimuddin
Golden Ratio of Data in Summary Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): August - October
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grdis.v6i4.2540

Abstract

This study analyzes the concept of maslahah in relation to abortion practices under Islamic law using a Law and Economics approach and examines its relevance to the National Health Insurance (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional/JKN) policy and the fiscal burden borne by the state. Abortion is not merely a matter of morality and religious law but also has economic implications for healthcare financing, maternal and child protection, and the efficiency of public resource allocation. This study employs a normative legal research method using conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches. Data were obtained through library research encompassing fiqh literature, maqasid al-shari'ah, Law and Economics theory, and regulations governing reproductive health and JKN administration in Indonesia. The findings indicate that the concept of maslahah in Islamic law places the protection of life (hifz al-nafs) as a primary objective. Accordingly, abortion is generally prohibited, except under emergency conditions that meet the requirements of shari'ah, such as when it is necessary to save the mother's life or address specific medical indications. From a Law and Economics perspective, policies that provide access to safe and legally permitted reproductive health services under legally justified conditions can minimize social costs, reduce complications arising from unsafe abortion, and improve the efficiency of JKN financing. Conversely, restrictions that are not accompanied by adequate access to healthcare services may increase the financial burden on the state due to the high costs of treating medical complications and their long-term social consequences. Therefore, integrating the principle of maslahah with legal-economic analysis can provide a basis for formulating health policies that are not only consistent with shari'ah values but also support the fiscal sustainability of JKN and the protection of the public interest.