Bahori Ahoen
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mpu Tantular, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PENERAPAN PILIHAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONFLIK KONTRAK BISNIS INTERNASIONAL ANTARA PELAKU USAHA INDONESIA DAN MITRA ASING Syeni Adriana Lasut; FX Suyud Margono; Bahori Ahoen; Appe Hutauruk
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2379

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing the application of choice of law in international business contracts between Indonesian business actors and foreign partners, identify the juridical obstacles encountered in its implementation, and formulate an ideal legal framework capable of ensuring legal certainty, justice, and legal utility. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches. The legal materials consist of primary legal sources, including the Indonesian Civil Code, Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, as well as international legal instruments such as the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts 2015, and the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (New York Convention). Secondary legal materials include legal textbooks, scientific journals, previous research, and scholarly opinions. The collected legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical approach. The findings reveal that the application of choice of law in international business contracts reflects the principle of freedom of contract and has been widely accepted in international commercial practice. Nevertheless, its implementation in Indonesia continues to face significant challenges, including the absence of a codified Private International Law, the lack of explicit regulations governing the limitations of choice of law, and the continued reliance on legal doctrines, judicial precedents, and the principle of public policy. This study proposes the reconstruction of Indonesia’s legal framework through the enactment of a comprehensive Private International Law Act regulating choice of law, choice of forum, the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards, and harmonization with internationally accepted principles of commercial law.
TINJAUAN TERHADAP SENGKETA KLAIM PEMBAYARAN PESERTA JAMINAN KESEHATAN NASIONAL ANTARA BADAN PENYELENGGARA JAMINAN SOSIAL KESEHATAN DAN RUMAH SAKIT GRAHA MEDIKA KENARI KABUPATEN BOGOR Sutan Sulaiman; FX Suyud Margono; Bahori Ahoen; Appe Hutauruk
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v9i1.2381

Abstract

As a developing nation where prosperity is not yet evenly distributed, Indonesia has an obligation to ensure the health of its citizens; consequently, the state established a health insurance program to guarantee healthcare for the entire population. This initiative aims to realize public welfare through a Social Security System (SSS), designed to provide a sense of security throughout a person’s life from birth to death. In 2014, the government implemented a universal health insurance policy known as the Social Security Agency for Health (BPJS Kesehatan), regulated by Law Number 24 of 2011 concerning the Social Security Agency (BPJS). Physicians affiliated with “Dokter Indonesia Bersatu” (DIB) have discussed the detrimental aspects of the BPJS program; these issues have significantly impacted hospitals’ ability to provide optimal patient care, leading to instances where patients under the BPJS program have been refused service in West Java. Conflicts have arisen between hospital administrations and BPJS due to ineffective collaboration. This thesis examines three key issues: the nature of the partnership between hospitals and BPJS; legal protections for hospitals regarding BPJS’s failure to settle payments for patient healthcare services; and the legal avenues available to hospitals should BPJS fail to make such payments. The study employs an empirical juridical legal research method, utilizing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. It adopts both statutory and socio-juridical approaches, gathering data through fieldwork and literature reviews. Data processing involves editing and coding, followed by quantitative descriptive analysis and the drawing of conclusions via the inductive method.