Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sosaintek: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Sains dan Teknologi
Achmad Daud Badar Isroil
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Religion Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Historis Sunni-Syiah Dalam Rantai Sanad Perspektif Kriteria Jarh Wa Ta'dil Achmad Daud Badar Isroil; Nor Salam; Fatmah; Nailal Muna
Sosaintek: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Sains dan Teknologi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Sosaintek: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Sains dan Teknologi, March, 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/sb0shb58

Abstract

This study examines traces of Sunni–Shiʿa polarization within hadith transmission chains following the Battle of Siffin (37 AH), focusing on how the criteria of jarḥ wa taʿdīl shaped historical narratives and distinct hadith canons. The research aims to analyze how narrator criticism functioned not merely as a technical assessment of reliability and integrity but also as a reflection of sectarian and political biases in the post-Rashidun period. Employing a qualitative historical-critical approach, the study analyzes primary sanad sources from Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī (Sunni) and Al-Kāfī (Shiʿa), with particular attention to controversial transmitters such as Zurarah b. Aʿyun, regarded as thiqah in Shiʿa scholarship but classified as rafiḍī or even matrūk in Sunni criticism. The findings reveal that sectarian polarization significantly influenced hadith methodology: Sunni scholars prioritized uninterrupted chains and the presumed integrity of the Companions, while Shiʿa scholars relied on the authoritative reports of the infallible Imams. The study concludes that jarḥ wa taʿdīl operated as an ideological filter that produced divergent hadith canons. These findings enrich comparative hadith epistemology and support contemporary reconciliation efforts through a maqāṣid al-sharīʿah framework, particularly relevant to Islamic scholarly dialogue in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Fatmah Fatmah Nailal Muna Nor Salam