Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Corona: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Umum, Psikolog, Keperawatan dan Kebidanan
Hakim Anasulfalah
STIKES Mamba Ul Ulum Surakarta
Health Professions Nursing Public Health

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Fear of Missing Out dan Perilaku Phubbing sebagai Prediktor Distres Psikologis pada Mahasiswa Kesehatan Hakim Anasulfalah; Aris Widiyanto; Ahmad Syauqi Mubarok; Rejo Rejo; Rafa Amartya Sukadi
Corona: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Umum, Psikolog, Keperawatan dan Kebidanan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September: Corona: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Umum, Psikolog, Keperawatan dan Kebida
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/corona.v4i3.2402

Abstract

Background: Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and phubbing are increasingly common among university students as smartphone use intensifies and may be associated with psychological distress. Evidence among health sciences students in Indonesia remains limited. This study examined the relationships and contributions of FoMO and phubbing to psychological distress among health sciences students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 150 health sciences students in Surakarta, Indonesia, selected using purposive sampling. FoMO was measured using the Fear of Missing Out Scale, phubbing using the Generic Scale of Phubbing, and psychological distress using the total score of the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk test, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression. Results: The mean scores were 31.55±6.60 for FoMO, 41.49±9.36 for phubbing, and 19.95±7.87 for psychological distress. FoMO was positively correlated with phubbing (r=0.467; p<0.001) and psychological distress (r=0.350; p<0.001). Phubbing was also positively correlated with psychological distress (r=0.425; p<0.001). The regression model was significant (F(2,147)=19.53; p<0.001) and explained 21.0% of the variance. FoMO (B=0.230; β=0.193; p=0.021) and phubbing (B=0.282; β=0.335; p<0.001) were significant predictors, with phubbing showing a stronger contribution. Conclusion: FoMO and phubbing are associated with psychological distress. Digital mental health programs should promote FoMO management, phubbing reduction, smartphone self-regulation, and direct social interaction. Causal relationships cannot be inferred due to the cross-sectional design.
Co-Authors Ahmad Syauqi Mubarok Rafa Amartya Sukadi Rejo Rejo Widiyanto, Aris