Nur Khofifah
Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

PENGARUH SARANA PRASARANA DAN METODE PEMBELAJARAN TERHADAP KUALITAS PEMBELAJARAN DI SMA NURUL FALAH BOGOR Nur Khofifah; Yenny Merinatul Hasanah
Jurnal Kepemimpinan dan Pengurusan Sekolah Vol. 11 No. 4 (2026): Regular Issue (In Progress)
Publisher : STKIP Pesisir Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34125/jkps.v11i4.3548

Abstract

This study aims to analyze: (1) the influence of infrastructure on the quality of learning, (2) the influence of learning methods on the quality of learning, and (3) the influence of infrastructure and learning methods simultaneously on the quality of learning at SMA Nurul Falah Bogor. The research method used is a causal associative quantitative approach with a saturated sample technique (total sample) involving 43 teachers as respondents. Data collection was carried out through a structured questionnaire such as Likert 1–5 and documentation. Data analysis techniques include validity tests, reliability tests, classical assumption tests (normality, multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity), multiple linear regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and hypothesis testing (t-test and F-test). The results of the study indicate that: (1) partially infrastructure does not have a significant effect on the quality of learning (t count = 1.493 < t table = 2.0227; Sig. = 0.143 > 0.05); (2) partially, learning methods have a positive and significant effect on learning quality (thitung = 6.472 > ttabel = 2.0227; Sig. = 0.001 < 0.05); and (3) simultaneously, infrastructure and learning methods have a positive and significant effect on learning quality (Fhitung = 21.442 > Ftabel = 3.23; Sig. = 0.001 < 0.05). The coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.517 (Adjusted R2 = 0.493) indicates that the infrastructure and learning methods variables together explain 51.7% of the variation in learning quality, while the remaining 48.3% is explained by factors outside this research model.