Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH)
Danang Budilaksono
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Konflik Norma antara Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dan Prinsip Persamaan Warga Negara dalam Kepemilikan Hak Milik Atas Tanah Danang Budilaksono; Habib Gufron; Ali Yusron
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i4.9778

Abstract

This study examines the normative conflict between the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY) special status regulations and the constitutional principle of equality of citizens in land ownership rights. Employing a normative-juridical research method with a statute, conceptual, and comparative approach, this study identifies a fundamental tension between the exclusive land rights system originating from the Sultanate's traditional legal order—particularly Gubernatorial Instruction No. K.898/I/A/1975—and the national land law framework as stipulated under the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) No. 5 of 1960 and the 1945 Constitution. The findings reveal that DIY's land ownership restrictions based on ethnic classification constitute a form of discrimination that conflicts with Articles 27, 28D, and 28I of the 1945 Constitution, the UUPA's principle of equal land access for all Indonesian citizens, and Law No. 40 of 2008 on the Elimination of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination. The existence of DIY Special Status Law No. 13 of 2012 provides a lex specialis argument but cannot supersede higher constitutional norms. The study further demonstrates that this normative conflict generates significant adverse implications, including legal uncertainty for non-indigenous WNI residents, suppression of investment climate, and threats to national legal system coherence. Resolution requires a systematic approach: revocation or revision of the 1975 Instruction, a restrictive interpretation of DIY's land authority under the Special Status Law, and the establishment of an effective dispute resolution mechanism.
Co-Authors Ali Yusron Habib Gufron