Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika dan Komunikasi
Muhammad Rangga W.H.P
Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan
Computer Science & IT Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Konstruksi Realitas dan Polarisasi Media: Analisis Framing Entman terhadap Pemberitaan Program Makan Bergizi Gratis CNNIndonesia.com dan Tempo.co Muhammad Rangga W.H.P; Faris Faris
Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika dan Komunikasi Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): September
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63447/jimik.v7i3.2061

Abstract

This study is motivated by the divergent media coverage regarding the Free Nutritious Meal (MBG) Program, which has the potential to shape the construction of reality and drive media polarization. The study aims to analyze the framing of the MBG Program by CNNIndonesia.com and Tempo.co, identify differences in how each outlet constructs reality, and analyze patterns of framing polarization and their implications for public opinion formation. A qualitative approach within a constructivist paradigm was employed, utilizing Robert N. Entman’s framing analysis model—encompassing the definition of problems, diagnosis of causes, moral judgments, and treatment recommendations—alongside Berger and Luckmann’s theory of the social construction of reality as an interpretive framework. The data set consists of 34 news articles published between January and April 2026 (16 from CNNIndonesia.com and 18 from Tempo.co), selected via purposive sampling. The findings reveal that both outlets consistently applied Entman’s four framing elements but emphasized different aspects. CNNIndonesia.com tended to employ an affirmative frame, highlighting policy successes, program achievements, and the program's sustainability, whereas Tempo.co predominantly utilized critical-structural and institutional-corrective frames, focusing on issues of governance, oversight, transparency, and implementation risks. These differences indicate the presence of framing polarization, driven by varying issue emphases, actor selection, and interpretations of facts. This situation has the potential to fragment public opinion through the divergent construction of reality across media outlets.
Co-Authors FARIS FARIS