Firdaus Arifin
Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTATION OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF GOOD GOVERNMENT IN THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN THE CITY OF BANDUNG Firdaus Arifin
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): March
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the general principles of good governance in public service delivery in Bandung City and formulates an operational model for strengthening legal compliance and service quality. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by document analysis of national legislation, Bandung municipal legal instruments, public-service standards, and oversight reports. The analysis shows that legal certainty, public interest, impartiality, accuracy, non-abuse of authority, openness, proportionality, professionalism, and accountability must operate as mutually reinforcing standards throughout the service cycle. Bandung has developed digital services, integrated service mechanisms, information disclosure, and complaint channels; However, implementation remains vulnerable to fragmented service standards, unequal digital access, weak feedback loops, and output-oriented accountability. The study proposes an AUPB-based service control model that links published standards, traceable administrative decisions, inclusive access, complaint resolution deadlines, and corrective follow-up. The AUPB model shifts from an abstract ethical reference into measurable legal safeguards for citizens and an internal control framework for municipal agencies.
EFFECTIVENESS OF DPRD SUPERVISION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BANDUNG CITY REGIONAL GOVERNMENT POLICIES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Firdaus Arifin
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): September
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzes the effectiveness of the Bandung City Regional House of Representatives in overseeing municipal policy implementation from a constitutional-law perspective. It uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and institutional approaches, supported by documentary analysis of legislation, council instruments, accountability documents, and public information. Oversight effectiveness is assessed through five dimensions: constitutional legitimacy, relevance of oversight targets, evidentiary quality, corrective follow-up, and public accountability. The study finds that the council possesses adequate formal instruments through meetings, requests for information, budget scrutiny, recommendations, and the rights of interpellation, inquiry, and expression. Nevertheless, formal activity does not automatically produce effective checks and balances. Effectiveness is reduced when oversight is event-driven, evidence is fragmented across commissions, recommendations lack deadlines and responsible units, coalition dynamics weaken critical distance, and the public cannot trace follow-up. The study proposes a closed-loop oversight model connecting risk-based agenda setting, standardized evidence, publicly traceable recommendations, executive corrective action, and verification. This model preserves the distinction between legislative oversight and executive administration while strengthening democratic accountability in Bandung City.