Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

WORKING CAPITAL RESILIENCE AND CASH-FLOW FORECASTING: AN INTEGRATED CAPABILITY MODEL FOR GROWING ENTERPRISES M. Syafarudin Mahaputra; Maya Ariyanti
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): Jesocin : November
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on working capital resilience, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about cash-flow forecasting to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects working capital resilience, cash-flow forecasting, and professional judgment through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: decision-useful information, control ownership, professional judgment, traceable evidence, and assurance and review. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.
CIRCULAR ECONOMY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: LINKING RESOURCE FLOWS, COST INFORMATION, AND STRATEGIC DECISIONS M. Syafarudin Mahaputra; Maya Ariyanti
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 2 No. 12 (2025): Jesocin : December
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on circular economy performance measurement, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about control ownership to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects circular economy performance measurement, control ownership, and professional judgment through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: decision-useful information, control ownership, professional judgment, traceable evidence, and assurance and review. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.
SUPPLY CHAIN FINANCE AND MSME RESILIENCE: A COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE MODEL FOR WORKING-CAPITAL ACCESS M. Rizqi Padma Negara; M. Syafarudin Mahaputra
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Jesocin : February
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on supply chain finance, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about msme resilience to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects supply chain finance, msme resilience, and professional judgment through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: decision-useful information, control ownership, professional judgment, traceable evidence, and assurance and review. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.
DIGITAL IDENTITY, CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE, AND PROTECTION: A TRUSTED ONBOARDING FRAMEWORK M. Syafarudin Mahaputra; Nazhira Nindya Padma Hanuun
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 6 (2026): Jesocin : June
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on digital identity, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about customer due diligence to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects digital identity, customer due diligence, and protection through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: data integrity, model and technology controls, human judgment, accountability, and continuous monitoring. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.