Muhammad Wendra
IBLAM School of Law

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Consumer protection in food trade: Reconstructing Indonesia’s safety standards under WTO SPS and TBT frameworks Andri Sutrisno; F.X. Joko Priyono; Nanik Trihastuti; Muhammad Wendra
Indonesian Journal of Law, Governance, and Regulation Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/ijlgr.v1i2.2215

Abstract

This article examines the rising regulatory challenges posed by intensifying global food trade under liberalization and highly integrated supply chains, where food safety standards operate not only as public health safeguards but also as de facto trade instruments. The study aims (i) to assess whether Indonesia’s food safety standards provide adequate consumer protection in global food trade while complying with the WTO SPS and TBT Agreements, and (ii) to formulate a reconstruction model of Indonesia’s food safety standards grounded in a One Health approach. Employing normative (doctrinal) legal research with a statute approach and a conceptual approach, this study analyzes WTO instruments (SPS Agreement, TBT Agreement), relevant WTO interpretive materials, and Indonesian food safety regulations, supported by authoritative reports from international organizations (e.g., FAO/WHO/WOAH) and key scholarly works. The findings indicate that Indonesia has formally adopted core SPS–TBT principles public health protection, precaution, and quality control yet substantive implementation remains partial. Regulatory practice is still sectoral and administrative, with risk assessment not consistently functioning as the central scientific basis required by SPS Articles 2 and 5, while limited transparency and incomplete harmonization with international standards may weaken legal legitimacy under TBT disciplines. The study’s novelty lies in demonstrating that the principal problem is not regulatory absence but regulatory orientation and method, and in proposing a One Health–based, risk-based, consumer oriented, SPS–TBT compliant, and trade-defensible reconstruction framework to strengthen consumer protection and reduce SPS–TBT dispute risks in the WTO.
UNHCR AND ROHINGYA REFUGEES IN ACEH: HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTIONS AMIDST COORDINATION AND SUSTAINABILITY CHALLENGES Andri Sutrisno; Muhammad Wendra; Muhammad Annas
Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol 14, No 1 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : Doctoral of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jhp.14.1.49-83

Abstract

Since 2017, military operations in Myanmar, justified as responses to attacks by Rohingya insurgent groups, have resulted in large-scale ethnic cleansing, forcing over 700,000 Rohingya to flee to neighboring countries, including Indonesia. Aceh, in particular, has become a significant destination due to its historical role as a refuge for displaced populations. The influx of refugees presents substantial challenges for local authorities and humanitarian organizations in meeting essential needs such as food, healthcare, and education. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has played a central role in responding to this humanitarian crisis by providing assistance and protection to Rohingya refugees in Aceh. Working closely with the Government of Indonesia and local non-governmental organizations (NGOs), UNHCR strives to uphold refugees’ fundamental rights and to mobilize international support effectively. Its interventions include the provision of basic necessities, access to healthcare services, educational programs, and efforts to facilitate integration into the local community where feasible. Despite these comprehensive efforts, significant challenges persist. Coordination among various actors—including government agencies, NGOs, and international donors—is often complex, resulting in gaps or overlaps in service delivery. Additionally, the sustainability of support remains a critical concern, as protracted displacement requires long-term planning, continuous funding, and consistent monitoring. This study focuses on two main issues: the role of UNHCR in delivering assistance and protection to Rohingya refugees in Aceh, and the challenges the agency faces in fulfilling its protection mandate. Employing doctrinal legal research, the study emphasizes international legal frameworks governing refugee protection and state responsibility. The findings indicate that while UNHCR has made substantial efforts to address immediate humanitarian needs, persistent challenges in coordination and sustainability must be addressed. Strengthening these areas is essential to ensure that the protection, welfare, and rights of Rohingya refugees are maintained effectively and sustainably over the long term.