<![CDATA[Abstract Introduction: Orthodontic camouflage treatment is a therapeutic approach aimed at disguising skeletal discrepancies by altering the position and angulation of teeth within the dental arches. Class III dentoskeletal malocclusion is considered one of the most complex and challenging orthodontic problems to manage. Skeletal and dental asymmetry in patients with class III subdivision malocclusion may further worsen the prognosis. Therefore, identifying the dentoalveolar and skeletal characteristics of subdivision malocclusions and understanding their possible treatment modalities are essential for achieving favorable non-surgical correction. This case report aims to describe the orthodontic camouflage treatment option for a patient with class III subdivision dentoskeletal malocclusion. Case Report: A 29-year-10-month-old female patient was referred from the Prosthodontic Clinic to the Orthodontic Clinic of the Dental Hospital, Faculty of Dentistry, Hasanuddin University, with complaints of crowding in both maxillary and mandibular teeth and protrusive lower anterior teeth relative to the upper teeth. Diagnosis revealed a skeletal Class III pattern with a normal maxillary position and a tendency toward mandibular prognathism (SNA 82°, SNB 83°, ANB −1°), Angle Class III subdivision malocclusion accompanied by moderate crowding, and a concave soft tissue profile. The case was treated using a non-extraction orthodontic camouflage approach with a straight-wire fixed appliance to correct crowding in both arches and anterior crossbite. Orthodontic treatment was completed within 20 months, resulting in successful correction of crowding and anterior crossbite. Discussion: Orthodontic camouflage provided satisfactory occlusal, skeletal, soft tissue, and functional improvements, correcting malocclusion and facial profile without orthognathic surgery. Conclusion: Orthodontic camouflage treatment in skeletal Class III malocclusion is considered a favorable treatment option because it can correct malocclusion through dentoalveolar compensation, thereby achieving good and stable occlusion. The treatment outcome demonstrated satisfactory and clinically acceptable results for the patient]]>
